Re: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base

2019-03-24 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 4:42 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:49:09PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of / > > > do not care abo

Re: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base

2019-03-24 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 24 mars 2019 09:42 +01, Geert Stappers : > What would be the harm to the Buster release > if lsb-base got NMU > with > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=888743;filename=init-functions.diff;msg=37 > ? Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern

Re: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base

2019-03-24 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:49:09PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of / > > do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng, > > probably every