Russ Allbery dijo [Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:07:21PM -0800]:
> (...)
> Is there any reason why it would cause problems for me to add an upstart
> job to the Debian package, even though Debian doesn't currently use
> upstart? (I realize that the logic around deactivating the init script if
> upstart
Steve Langasek writes:
> So if you really want to upstartify the package for Ubuntu (which isn't
> necessary - the current focus in Ubuntu is upstartifying those services
> that are on a default system, there's not as much benefit to converting
> other services yet), my personal recommendation fo
Kel Modderman writes:
> debehlper >= 7.4.1 contains an implementation of dh_installinit which
> takes care of debian/$package.upstart (and debian/$package.$name.upstart
> when called with --name= parameter) by installing the job(s) to
> /etc/init.d/ with a symlink from /etc/init.d/$jobfile ->
> /
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 07:49:58PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> > One of the packages I maintain, OpenAFS, is a network file system. As
> > such, one generally wants it to start before things like gdm that need to
> > read the user's home directory. However, in Ubuntu, gdm is started by
> > upst
On Saturday 12 December 2009 07:07:21 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> One of the packages I maintain, OpenAFS, is a network file system. As
> such, one generally wants it to start before things like gdm that need to
> read the user's home directory. However, in Ubuntu, gdm is started b
Am Freitag 11 Dezember 2009 22:07:21 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Hello everyone,
>
> One of the packages I maintain, OpenAFS, is a network file system. As
> such, one generally wants it to start before things like gdm that need to
> read the user's home directory. However, in Ubuntu, gdm is started
6 matches
Mail list logo
