Re: debian kernels and APM poweroff

2006-10-25 Thread Henning Glawe
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:01:04AM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote: > A possible solution is to put > > options apm poweroff > argh. stupid typo. should be: options apm power_off -- c u henning signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian kernels

2005-05-30 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 20:36 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > 1) What's the timeframe? Should it be available for Sarge, so it needs > > >quick packaging? [...] > Uh, I don't care how quickly you package it, we're not promoting a totally > new package from unstable to stable in the space of a

Re: Debian kernels

2005-05-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 07:21:41AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Monday 30 May 2005 06:01, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (*) I don't have time to take on another package at the moment. But I > > > would be happy to help someone who wants to package auditd. > > I have a l

Re: Debian kernels

2005-05-29 Thread Russell Coker
On Monday 30 May 2005 06:01, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (*) I don't have time to take on another package at the moment. But I > > would be happy to help someone who wants to package auditd. > > I have a little time and would like to package auditd. There are two > problems

Re: Debian kernels

2005-05-29 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:09 +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > The option CONFIG_AUDIT needs to be enabled to allow SE Linux access denials > to be logged, without this it is impossible to use SE Linux. While making > such changes enabling the option CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL would be useful, this > enabl