Re: Debian Policy version

2006-05-05 Thread Joe Smith
"Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems to me that it is unreasonable for the PTS to be updated before the policy package actually hits the mirrors. There is a period of time after a package leaves incomming but before the mirrors are updated when

Re: Debian Policy version

2006-05-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 04 May 2006, Joe Smith wrote: > It seems to me that it is unreasonable for the PTS to be updated before the > policy package actually hits the mirrors. > There is a period of time after a package leaves incomming but before the > mirrors are updated when the package is difficult to >

Re: Debian Policy version

2006-05-04 Thread Joe Smith
"Frank Küster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However, version 3.7.2.0 is neither in unstable nor at http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ Both only have version 3.7.1.0. How comes that the PTS has a newer version th

Re: Debian Policy version

2006-05-04 Thread Frank Küster
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, version 3.7.2.0 is neither in unstable nor at > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ > Both only have version 3.7.1.0. How comes that the PTS has a newer version > than all the other sources? http://incoming.debian.org/ -- Frank Küster