Andrea Veri wrote:
>> Teams make sense if most of the packages in the group follow the same
>> structure, for example perl packages, and maintainers are essentially
>> exchangeable because one does not need to understand how the software in
>> question actually works.
Teams also make sense when m
Simon Richter ha scritto:
> I also have found that for team-maintained packages, I felt less and less
> responsible for packages after receiving mails that told me that they had
> "fixed" some deliberate choice I made. The same people hell-bent on having
> every package team-maintained will not s
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:14:57PM +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Actually there isn't a specific problem, I just think working as a team
> might improve the quality of packages when, for istance, a MIA
> maintainer leaves his package orphaned for long time without having no
> one looking at it.
Simon Richter ha scritto:
> Is there a specific problem you are trying to solve?
Actually there isn't a specific problem, I just think working as a team
might improve the quality of packages when, for istance, a MIA
maintainer leaves his package orphaned for long time without having no
one looking
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 02:10:28AM +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
> since some time I'm wondering why there is *not* a Debian-p2p team
> active already. We have several p2p-related packages in the archive and
> it looks like they are maintained individually and not by a specific
> team.
Is there
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> hi,
>
Hi,
> since some time I'm wondering why there is *not* a Debian-p2p team
> active already. We have several p2p-related packages in the archive and
> it looks like they are maintained individually and not by a specific
> team. Therefore
6 matches
Mail list logo
