* Petter Reinholdtsen
| [James Troup]
| > Tor Slettnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| I forwarded this email to his other address, which I came across in a
| mail from a common friend of our.
I've recently mailed with him, and for the time being, he is out of
time for doing Debian work.
--
Tollef Fo
[James Troup]
> Tor Slettnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I forwarded this email to his other address, which I came across in a
mail from a common friend of our.
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-13 12:11]:
> Here is a list of packages in unstable maintained by people on James's
> lists. May not be complete, but I grepped for names and for emails
> seperately so probably found most of them.
Thanks for this list; thoes packages have been orphaned or
Sorry, my terminal was too small to check all the replies in the thread,
including Hector's himself 0:-)
Glad to see this clarified.
--
I would rather starve than lose your acceptance
.''`.My eyes will always show my empty soul
: :' :- Boy Sets Fire
There must be some mistake :-m
Joey Hess dijo:
> Tor Slettnes
> mindi
> mondo
> smail
> xcdroast
> yard
> zmailer
> zmailer-ssl
These are Héctor García's and he is not MIA at all.
What happened?
--
I would rather starve than lose your accept
Thank you for the kind reply, Michael.
I apparently do not understand how to properly retitle a bug yet. I
have been lurking, so I will examine the numerous examples to grok
the proper method. I fear I went off half-cocked at the first
attempt.
I lurk on d-announce, d-devel-announce, d-mentors, d
Simon Huggins wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:25:49AM +0200, Héctor García Álvarez wrote:
> > El mar, 13 de 05 de 2003 a las 18:11, Joey Hess escribió:
> > > Tor Slettnes
> > I am the maintainer for those packages and I'm not MIA for the moment.
> > Please check your list again.
> >
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:34:02AM -0800, Fielder George Dowding wrote:
Hi,
> As a result of the lack of action on Mr. Take's part regarding these
> outstanding bug reports, the Defoma package has been listed as
> orphaned (#180188) before the critical bug (#181749) was submitted.
> I am attempt
On Wed, 14 May 2003, Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> Hi, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Is there a mnemonic for that? I.e., does "wat" stand for something?
>
> Is that email address an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
>
> (ObTLA: mia == "missing in action")
Or should that be awol@
* Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-14 16:00]:
> > Is there a mnemonic for that? I.e., does "wat" stand for something?
> Is that email address an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
No.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Is there a mnemonic for that? I.e., does "wat" stand for something?
Is that email address an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
(ObTLA: mia == "missing in action")
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Consulting @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was s
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:51:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > If you know how to reach any of the people listed in [1] and [2] below,
> > please feel free to contact them and get them to reply to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Is there a mnemonic for that? I.e., does "wat" stand for something?
Hiya,
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:25:49AM +0200, Héctor García Álvarez wrote:
> El mar, 13 de 05 de 2003 a las 18:11, Joey Hess escribió:
> > Tor Slettnes
> I am the maintainer for those packages and I'm not MIA for the moment.
> Please check your list again.
> Héctor García Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECT
El mar, 13 de 05 de 2003 a las 18:11, Joey Hess escribió:
> Tor Slettnes
> mindi
> mondo
> smail
> xcdroast
> yard
> zmailer
> zmailer-ssl
I am the maintainer for those packages and I'm not MIA for the moment.
Please check your list again.
BTW, if someone
* Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-13 21:50]:
> are you all also checking to see if people in the nm queue are still
> active?
If they have not been approved by their AM yet, their AM will notice
and put them on hold and eventually reject them. For those who have
been approved by their
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:55:44AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Fielder George Dowding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-13 09:34]:
> > I note that Yasuhiro Take ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not listed in your
> > missive.
>
> Yes, because the criteria outlined in the first paragraph of James'
> messag
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:11:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Here is a list of packages in unstable maintained by people on James's
> lists. May not be complete, but I grepped for names and for emails
> seperately so probably found most of them.
[...]
> No reply:
[...]
> Tor Slettnes
> mindi
> Why is it a bug for the compilation of a program to depend on one of the many
> script interpreters in Debian?
>
> If the upstream authors want to write shell code that can only be interpreted
> by tcsh in their build scripts then it shouldn't be a bug in the Debian
> package as long as the t
James Troup said:
> [2]
>
> No reply
> -
> Alexander Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have another email address for Alex, and have forwarded your email to
him. Unfortunately, he's not in the country right now, so quicker
contact is difficult. :(
--
--
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:40:01AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003 06:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > tcsh as a build-dependency? Seems like a bug in openoffice. That
> > should be fixed regardless of whether we keep tcsh.
>
> Why is it a bug for the compilation of a program to
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:21:14PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Le Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:39:46PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels écrivait:
> > > page). What happened to the qa MIA database? The code's at
> > > http://cvs.debian.org/mia/?cvsroot=qa
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 16:59:25 -0400
> "MZ" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MZ>
MZ> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:42:03PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Joey Hess wrote:
>> > Luis Francisco Gonzalez
>> >tcsh
>> >tcsh-i18n
>> >tcsh-kanji
>>
>> uuh, tcsh is an OpenOff
On Wed, 14 May 2003 06:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> tcsh as a build-dependency? Seems like a bug in openoffice. That should
> be fixed regardless of whether we keep tcsh.
Why is it a bug for the compilation of a program to depend on one of the many
script interpreters in Debian?
If the upstream
Hi Joey,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:11:16 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Pavel Tcholakov
> hylafax-client
> hylafax-doc
> hylafax-server
Pavel responded a few days ago here to the hylafax thread (as kay
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) and to a private mail I sent him last tuesday
containing fix
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:39:46PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels écrivait:
> > page). What happened to the qa MIA database? The code's at
> > http://cvs.debian.org/mia/?cvsroot=qa but I can't find anything online.
>
> The code is setup on qa.debian.org, ju
Le Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:39:46PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels écrivait:
> "echelon" in this context meaning the mailing lists? As described in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2000/debian-project-21/msg7.html
> ?
I guess so, yes. I don't know of any other echelon in Debian.
> page)
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:51:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 02:41:49PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > reach any of the people listed in [1] and [2] below, please feel free
> > to contact them and get them to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Is there a mnemonic for tha
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:42:03PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Luis Francisco Gonzalez
> > tcsh
> > tcsh-i18n
> > tcsh-kanji
>
> uuh, tcsh is an OpenOffice.org Build-Dependency
> I wouldn't take it because I don't use it, but we need it...
tcsh as a build-
First off, great work! Now I can remove the retirement item off my
old "todo" list. [1]
On Tue, 13 May 2003, James Troup wrote:
> On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
> inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
> looking first at all maintainer
* Fielder George Dowding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-13 09:34]:
> I note that Yasuhiro Take ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not listed in your
> missive.
Yes, because the criteria outlined in the first paragraph of James'
message don't apply to him. However, we are also checking for other
inactive people
Hi,
[ the following assumes the packages being orphaned ]
Joey Hess wrote:
> Luis Francisco Gonzalez
> tcsh
> tcsh-i18n
> tcsh-kanji
uuh, tcsh is an OpenOffice.org Build-Dependency
I wouldn't take it because I don't use it, but we need it...
> Tor Slettnes
> mindi
>
Greetings James,
I note that Yasuhiro Take ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not listed in your
missive. He is maintainer for the Defoma package which has a large
number of bug reports some of which have apparently been corrected
by NMU's but not closed. There is a recent critical bug (#181749, 82
days old)
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 02:41:49PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
> inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
> looking first at all maintainers who didn't have a source package
> signed by (one of) their key(s)
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:11:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[snip]
> Joost Kooij
> xbat
[snip]
FWIW, Joost responded to me last Nov (gee, has it been that long ago
already? :-/) for NMU'ing xbat. If he still fails to respond, I could take
over the package.
T
--
"Uhh, I'm still not here."
[James Troup]
> On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
> inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
> looking first at all maintainers who didn't have a source package
> signed by (one of) their key(s) in unstable and then excluding from
> that anyo
James Troup wrote:
> Jay Kominek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nathan Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I happen to know of a machine Jay logged into yesterday, so I have emailed
him at that account. I have mailed Nathan too, though he seems to be in
the middle of a job change and move.
My, a lot of folks I hate
> On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
> inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
> looking first at all maintainers who didn't have a source package
> signed by (one of) their key(s) in unstable and then excluding from
> that anyone who had bee
37 matches
Mail list logo
