On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:52:27PM +, Edd Dumbill wrote:
> I'm not currently subscribed to debian-devel, but am happy to contribute
> in any way I can to this effort, so please feel free to CC me, or bring
Hi Edd, thank for taking part in this discussion!
Debian side, I presume the peculiar t
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 11:33:43PM +0800, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote:
> > > 1) Should we include DOAP files from upstream in packages? (always?)
> > Why not :)
>
> I'd l
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Luca Brivio wrote:
> BTW, I don't know what's with the "Collaborative Repository of
> Meta-Informations"[1]. Maybe Raphael can provide some useful insights to the
> debate.
Well, CRMI is still a concept, we got mole implemented by Jeroen which
helps a lot in archive-wide sca
mer 26 dicembre 2007, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
> I see two ways of serving it that seem to me much more useful: provide a
> centralized, archive-wide place, where we serve all the DOAPs of Debian
> packages. The more obvious places to me seem packages.d.o and/or the
> PTS.
BTW, I don't know
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote:
> > 1) Should we include DOAP files from upstream in packages? (always?)
> Why not :)
I'd like too.
> I see two ways of serving it that seem to me much more useful:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote:
> 1) Should we include DOAP files from upstream in packages? (always?)
Why not :)
> 2) If so, where? (usr/share/doc sounds OK if they are only provided for sake
> of completeness, while IMVHO if we want them to be globally parsed and/o
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote:
1) Should we include DOAP files from upstream in packages? (always?)
I think it's a good idea.
2) If so, where? (usr/share/doc sounds OK if they are only provided for sake
of completeness, while IMVHO if we want them to be globally
7 matches
Mail list logo