Hi David, and others,
On 11-09-05 at 05:25pm, David Given wrote:
> I even spent a while looking for existing packages with the same
> license as mine from which I could steal the copyright file, but I
> couldn't find anything which used DEP5...
Sorry to hear that you have tried and grown frustr
Le Monday 5 September 2011 18:25:48, David Given a écrit :
> FWIW, I have recently tried to put together a DEP5 compliant copyright
> file for a package I'm working on. I say 'tried' because eventually I
> had to give up. I was simply unable to get enough information out of the
> spec to produce a
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:55:26PM +0300, Andrew O. Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:46:50 +0600
> Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> > > Until that happens, please use whatever URL you like. I use
> > > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ myself.
>
> > Note that some people think that
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 15:46 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > DEP5 is in the process of being incorporated into the debian-policy
> > package, and once that is finished, there will be a stable URL to
> > the spec (with a version number in the URL), something like
> >
> > http://www.debia
Hello,
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:46:50 +0600
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > Until that happens, please use whatever URL you like. I use
> > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ myself.
> Note that some people think that http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ is
> not a versioned URL and so it doesn't comply t
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 05:56:25PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > This is a minor issue,but I would propose to change it to
> > http://svn.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=REVISION
> > if the Format field should point to a specific svn version of the
> > document. However, as f
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 05:05:35PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I would recommend in the meantime to use a versioned URL of your
> choosing. As I believe is documented - the specific URL should be only
> an example.
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 05:56:25PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Until tha
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:34:22PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> This is a minor issue,but I would propose to change it to
> http://svn.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=REVISION
> if the Format field should point to a specific svn version of the
> document. However, as far as
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
> I would recommend in the meantime to use a versioned URL of your
> choosing. As I believe is documented - the specific URL should be only
> an example.
FWIW, I have recently tried to put together a DEP5 compliant copyright
file for a package I'm working on. I say
On 11-09-05 at 03:34pm, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> The current version of DEP-5 encourages people to use versioned url
> for the Format: Field, as far as I can see from the description of
> this field, and the way the examples.
>
> However, using the proposed expression in the description of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
