Steve Langasek writes:
> The one reason to include this information in debian/copyright is that
> the packagers may be copyright holders for contents under Debian.
[…]
Gunnar Wolf writes:
> Ben Finney dijo [Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 05:27:04PM +1000]:
> > I don't see why ‘debian/copyright’ needs t
Ben Finney dijo [Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 05:27:04PM +1000]:
> > In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream
> > sources (if any) were obtained. *It should name the original
> > authors of the package and the Debian maintainer(s) who were
> > involved with its creation.*
On 04:17 Mon 08 Jun , Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:51:39PM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> > So I see no needs in having the debian maintainer(s) name who were involved
> > in
> > the creation in debian/copyright too. It's an information duplication.
>
> The one reason to
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:51:39PM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> So I see no needs in having the debian maintainer(s) name who were involved in
> the creation in debian/copyright too. It's an information duplication.
The one reason to include this information in debian/copyright is that the
packag
On 17:27 Mon 08 Jun , Ben Finney wrote:
> Deng Xiyue writes:
>
> > According to Debian Policy Manual section 12.5:
> >
> > In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream
> > sources (if any) were obtained. *It should name the original
> > authors of the package and t
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 05:27:04PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Deng Xiyue writes:
>
> > According to Debian Policy Manual section 12.5:
> >
> > In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream
> > sources (if any) were obtained. *It should name the original
> > authors of t
Deng Xiyue writes:
> According to Debian Policy Manual section 12.5:
>
> In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream
> sources (if any) were obtained. *It should name the original
> authors of the package and the Debian maintainer(s) who were
> involved with its c
Deng Xiyue writes:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:51:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Removing that part from Policy would be my preference. It's
>> duplication of information that's already in the changelog.
>
> Would it merit a BTS entry against debian-policy as a reminder?
Sure. Although we
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:51:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Deng Xiyue writes:
>
> > [Don't know whether this has been asked. If so, pointers are welcomed.]
> >
> > According to Debian Policy Manual section 12.5:
> >
> > In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources
Deng Xiyue writes:
> [Don't know whether this has been asked. If so, pointers are welcomed.]
>
> According to Debian Policy Manual section 12.5:
>
> In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources
> (if any) were obtained. *It should name the original authors of the
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
