Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-27 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 25/12/2016 à 21:09, Vincent Bernat a écrit : > ❦ 25 décembre 2016 19:17 +0100, Stéphane Blondon > : > >> So, the final compiled file can be a mix of several languages but the >> languages are separated in the sources. >> >> Sometimes yaml is transformed into HTML too; I saw that on the ser

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-26 Thread Russell Stuart
On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 19:17 +0100, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > Perhaps I missed something, so I'm curious to learn more about it (a > link or some keywords can be a good start). The buzz work mix is: - vue-loader - webpack - webpack plugin for .vue files (mix of HTML, CSS/sass/stylus, and JS). and

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-25 Thread Jérémy Lal
2016-12-25 19:17 GMT+01:00 Stéphane Blondon : > Le 24/12/2016 à 00:51, Russell Stuart a écrit : >> [0] I was proudly shown some production "web code" yesterday. Cutting >> edge stuff, apparently. A single file contained HTML, css, and JS. >> [...] >> >> But how could a linter process

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-25 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 25 décembre 2016 19:17 +0100, Stéphane Blondon  : > So, the final compiled file can be a mix of several languages but the > languages are separated in the sources. > > Sometimes yaml is transformed into HTML too; I saw that on the server side. > > Perhaps I missed something, so I'm curious to l

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-25 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 24/12/2016 à 00:51, Russell Stuart a écrit : > [0] I was proudly shown some production "web code" yesterday. Cutting > edge stuff, apparently. A single file contained HTML, css, and JS. > [...] > > But how could a linter process that, I asked - it was some unholy > mess of 3(?

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Russell Stuart
On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 21:36 +, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > This list is about development of Debian. > > Not about how to raise money to ease developing Debian. The first condition is fulfilled - the email is about getting development done within Debian. In fact given ITP's I've seen floating

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Excerpts from Pirate Praveen's message of December 23, 2016 6:26 pm: On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 09:52 വൈകു, Joerg Jaspert wrote: For any problem, yes. For fundraising, no. So only problem, no solution? This list is about development of Debian. Not about how to raise money to ease developing

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 09:52 വൈകു, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > For any problem, yes. For fundraising, no. So only problem, no solution? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14530 March 1977, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> While its good (for someone) that this work is done, and hooray if it >> can be sponsored by crowdfunding, I dont think that this list is the >> proper place for it. > 2. I think -devel is right place for discussing a problem that goes > beyond a singl

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 01:38 വൈകു, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > While its good (for someone) that this work is done, and hooray if it > can be sponsored by crowdfunding, I dont think that this list is the > proper place for it. > I thought this is the right place because, 1. It affects many packag

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14529 March 1977, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> We are onto our second round of crowd funding >> https://www.generosity.com/community-fundraising/debian-browserify-2 > gulp is now accepted in main. If we get more support for the campaign, > we hope to continue packaging more nodejs build tools (next

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 23 നവംബര്‍ 2016 10:12 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > We are onto our second round of crowd funding > https://www.generosity.com/community-fundraising/debian-browserify-2 gulp is now accepted in main. If we get more support for the campaign, we hope to continue packaging more nodejs build

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thursday 13 October 2016 12:13 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > I suppose you have considered using browserify-lite when possible ? > It is actually quite rare (and usually a bad sign of quality, imo) to > see modules > that do require the full-fledge browserify. I did use browserify-lite for fuzzaldrin

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-24 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 24/11/16 09:31, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:31 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> If you can expand the scope of your crowdfunding effort to cover >> those libraries needed for homer-ui, then I'm happy to promote >> the crowdfunding in the HOMER and free RTC communities. >

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:31 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > If you can expand the scope of your crowdfunding effort to cover those > libraries needed for homer-ui, then I'm happy to promote the > crowdfunding in the HOMER and free RTC communities. Can you ask the upstream to create a list of dep

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-24 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 24/11/16 06:26, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:25 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> Would you be interested in helping package JS dependencies for >> homer-ui[1] in Debian? > > Right now, my plates are full. I will have a look once I complete > gulp and webpack. > >> We a

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:25 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Would you be interested in helping package JS dependencies for > homer-ui[1] in Debian? Right now, my plates are full. I will have a look once I complete gulp and webpack. > We already have a homer-api package[2] but it is most useful

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 23/11/16 17:42, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Friday 11 November 2016 05:04 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> We have already completed 19 days of work (120 new packages and >> 8 updates). We raised only half the target and completed close to >> the same amount of work. > > We are onto our second rou

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Friday 11 November 2016 05:04 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > We have already completed 19 days of work (120 new packages and 8 > updates). We raised only half the target and completed close to the same > amount of work. We are onto our second round of crowd funding https://www.generosity.com/commu

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tuesday 01 November 2016 02:01 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > We shifted out focus to grunt from browserify realizing grunt is needed > by more packages. Final update before the fund raising closes in about 20 hours https://poddery.com/posts/2734574 Summary: all new dependencies are completed (4

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-01 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, നവംബർ 2 2:22:00 AM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >Did you means that you plan a rebuild of package with grunt when grunt >is released ? At the minimum the packages I care about and currently in contrib or should be in contrib. libjs-handlebars, libjs-fuzzaldrin-plus, jquery modules f

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-01 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 12 October 2016 11:09 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > We have been discussing browserified javascript situation in debian for > sometime. We decided to spent one full month on packaging browserify if > we can raise enough money via crowd funding. See > http://igg.me/at/debian-brow

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-10-12 Thread Jérémy Lal
2016-10-12 19:39 GMT+02:00 Pirate Praveen : > Hi, > > We have been discussing browserified javascript situation in debian for > sometime. We decided to spent one full month on packaging browserify if > we can raise enough money via crowd funding. See > http://igg.me/at/debian-browserify for more d