>> This is a good reason to forbid source-only uploads, but there is another,
>> which actually leverages what we do now, and the idea of not using the
>> maintainer-provided binary packages in order to have better determinism on
>> the build:
> [...]
> Sounds like a great idea, yes.
> If ftpmaster
[Joey Hess]
> File sizes won't 100% stable unfortunatly but the rest should be.
Well, depending on how often I upgrade, vs. how often the buildd does
(and for that matter, how long my package sits in a queue before it is
built), there can be dependency changes due to build-depends shlibs /
symbol
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> This is a good reason to forbid source-only uploads, but there is another,
> which actually leverages what we do now, and the idea of not using the
> maintainer-provided binary packages in order to have better determinism on
> the build:
[...]
Sounds like a gre
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> 1. Instead of discarding upon upload the maintainer-provided binary uploads,
>we should first retain some interesting metadata[1] about it, and then
>discard.
>
>* Packages that outright FTBFS won't get uploaded
>
> 2. Autobuild all binary packages
4 matches
Mail list logo
