On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > My understanding is that Debian declares a work non-free if a holder
> > of a software idea patent is *actively enforcing* a patent that covers
> > the work, such that Debian cannot distrigute the work as free
> > software.
>
> Is there a known case
> My understanding is that Debian declares a work non-free if a holder
> of a software idea patent is *actively enforcing* a patent that covers
> the work, such that Debian cannot distrigute the work as free
> software.
Is there a known case where a holder actively enforces a patent that covers
M
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I was just reading an interview[0] of someone from the 'Freetype' project
> and he said:
> ...
> Also, I still don't understand why Debian and Ubuntu keep distributing
> patent-infringing code in FreeType, while they keep MP3 and DVD playback
> out of
3 matches
Mail list logo
