On Saturday 14 November 2015 16:02:18 Neil Williams wrote:
> scan-copyrights must get much better handling of non-text formats.
> I tried it with a package containing a lot of png files, the example at
> the top of the manpage failed because the output of scan-copyrights was
> a binary file. (It's
Quoting Osamu Aoki (2015-11-15 04:07:10)
> Please note one type of de-facto exception which is not documented but
> widely accepted. FTP master has accepted such packages with the GNU
> permissive type license on autotools generated files. I see almost no
> one follow the rule literary on thes
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:51:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
> It is important to list all copyright holders; this is not something that
> it's "easy enough" to look up in the source, because many of these free
> software licenses require that you reproduce the copyright statement
> whe
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:34:11PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:51:11 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:10:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
> [...]
> > And we should have better tools to generate debian/copyright files - this
> > shouldn't be an inten
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:28:02 +0100
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Le vendredi 13 novembre 2015, 16:10:14 16:10:14 Wookey a écrit :
> > However there are numerous copyright holders and files contributed
> > on various dates so I spent several hours making this copyright
> > file:
> > https://sources.de
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2015, 16:10:14 16:10:14 Wookey a écrit :
> However there are numerous copyright holders and files contributed on
> various dates so I spent several hours making this copyright file:
> https://sources.debian.net/src/ompl/1.0.0%2Bds2-1/debian/copyright/
> with each copyright o
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:34:11PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:51:11 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:10:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
> [...]
> > And we should have better tools to generate debian/copyright files - this
> > shouldn't be an intensive
+++ Steve Langasek [2015-11-13 10:51 -0800]:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:10:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
> > I've been helping package a load of stuff recently for Robot OS and in
> > checking the copyright files I've come up aginst the question of exactly
> > how much segmentation there should be in
Steve Langasek writes:
> shouldn't be an intensive manual process. Unfortunately the only tool I'm
> aware of that does this is coupled to cdbs.
I wrote http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/git/git-copyright-scan.git/ to update
debian/copyright based on upstream git history. There's no documentation
and it
Excerpts from Steve Langasek's message of 2015-11-13 10:51:11 -0800:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:10:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
> > I've been helping package a load of stuff recently for Robot OS and in
> > checking the copyright files I've come up aginst the question of exactly
> > how much segment
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:51:11 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:10:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
[...]
> And we should have better tools to generate debian/copyright files - this
> shouldn't be an intensive manual process. Unfortunately the only tool I'm
> aware of that does th
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:10:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
> I've been helping package a load of stuff recently for Robot OS and in
> checking the copyright files I've come up aginst the question of exactly
> how much segmentation there should be in copyright files, and the answer
> to that depends on
On 13/11/15 17:10, Wookey wrote:
> The criteria that makes most sense to me is 'by licence'.
+1
> I just uploaded rosdistro
> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ros-rosdistro) and got a comment from
> the reviewing ftpmaster that combining the two different copyright holders
> for BSD-3-clause file
Hi,
On 13-11-15 17:10, Wookey wrote:
> The criteria that makes most sense to me is 'by licence'.
The machine readable copyright file definition says this:
"""The Copyright field collects all relevant copyright notices for the
files of this paragraph. Not all copyright notices may apply to every
i
14 matches
Mail list logo
