> "Ole" == Ole J Tetlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ole> Am I overlooking something obvious here? libgtk1.1.13-dev
Ole> provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
Ole> but
Ole> libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with libgtk-dev
libgtk1.1-dev is really an obsolete package in potato. Think o
On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
> *-Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> | The fact that the *actual* libgtk1.1-dev package conflicts with
> | libgtk-dev, does not mean that the package libgtk1.13-dev, which provides
> | libgtk1.1-dev, must conflict with libgtk-dev.
> |
> | Or, in the abstra
*-Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| The fact that the *actual* libgtk1.1-dev package conflicts with
| libgtk-dev, does not mean that the package libgtk1.13-dev, which provides
| libgtk1.1-dev, must conflict with libgtk-dev.
|
| Or, in the abstract:
|
| If A conflicts with B, and C provides A, th
On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
> *-Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> | On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
> |
> | > Am I overlooking something obvious here?
> | >
> | > libgtk1.1.13-dev provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
> | >
> | > but
> | >
> | > libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with li
*-Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
|
| > Am I overlooking something obvious here?
| >
| > libgtk1.1.13-dev provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
| >
| > but
| >
| > libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with libgtk-dev
| >
| > this means that gnome-apt refuses to insta
On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
> Am I overlooking something obvious here?
>
> libgtk1.1.13-dev provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
>
> but
>
> libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with libgtk-dev
>
> this means that gnome-apt refuses to install libgtk1.1.13-dev,
> a package that I sorely need. Aren
6 matches
Mail list logo