Re: Compiz-fusion question

2007-10-22 Thread sean finney
hiya, On Monday 22 October 2007 11:26:46 am Alok G. Singh wrote: > On 21 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have found that compiz-fusion in official debian repository is not > > complete (or is not compiz-fusion at all). > > shame has some thoroughly unofficial packages [1] that work (not f

Re: Compiz-fusion question

2007-10-22 Thread sean finney
hiya, On Sunday 21 October 2007 03:00:36 pm Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 15:36:38 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I have found that compiz-fusion in official debian repository is not > > complete (or is not compiz-fusion at all). It misses such things as ccsm > >

Re: Compiz-fusion question

2007-10-22 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mo, 22 Okt 2007, Alok G. Singh wrote: > shame has some thoroughly unofficial packages [1] that work (not from > personal experience though). Personal experience: Working very well, only that upgrading sometimes needs --force-overwrite since files/packaging changes. Best wishes Norbert --

Re: Compiz-fusion question

2007-10-22 Thread Alok G. Singh
On 21 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have found that compiz-fusion in official debian repository is not > complete (or is not compiz-fusion at all). shame has some thoroughly unofficial packages [1] that work (not from personal experience though). Footnotes: [1] http://shame.tuxfamily.

Re: Compiz-fusion question

2007-10-21 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [Sean, sorry for the uncalled CC, just wanted to make sure you got this] Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 15:36:38 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I have found that compiz-fusion in official debian repository is not >> c

Re: Compiz-fusion question

2007-10-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 15:36:38 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi! > > I have found that compiz-fusion in official debian repository is not > complete (or is not compiz-fusion at all). It misses such things as ccsm > (seems like compizconfig-settings-manager?). I believe there is some > reaso