Re: Compiling libc4 on Debian unstable

2005-01-14 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Christoph Berg wrote: > [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $host archive.debian.org > archive.debian.org has address 208.185.25.38 > [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $host 208.185.25.38 > 38.25.185.208.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer raff.debian.org. > > http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=ra

Re: Compiling libc4 on Debian unstable

2005-01-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Christoph Berg] > [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $host archive.debian.org > archive.debian.org has address 208.185.25.38 > [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $host 208.185.25.38 > 38.25.185.208.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer raff.debian.org. google has no trouble finding mirrors for it, though. Peter signatu

Re: Compiling libc4 on Debian unstable

2005-01-12 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Matthew Garrett in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Can't you just grab a libc4 deb from archive.debian.org? That worked > fine last time I tried it. [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $host archive.debian.org archive.debian.org has address 208.185.25.38 [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $host 208.185.25.38 38.25.185.208.in-

Re: Compiling libc4 on Debian unstable

2005-01-12 Thread Matthew Garrett
Hal Niner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > I need to compile libc4 on a brand-new unstable Debian machine in > order to run a 10-year old executable (it only needs /libc.so.4). I > believe it is doable (famous last words!), but I wanted to consult > this list (which I hope is the correct o

Re: Compiling libc4 on Debian unstable

2005-01-12 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Hal Niner wrote: > I need to compile libc4 on a brand-new unstable Debian machine in > order to run a 10-year old executable (it only needs /libc.so.4). I > believe it is doable (famous last words!), but I wanted to consult > this list (which I hope is the correct one) in ord

Re: Compiling libc4 on Debian unstable

2005-01-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 12, Hal Niner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to compile libc4 on a brand-new unstable Debian machine in > order to run a 10-year old executable (it only needs /libc.so.4). I > believe it is doable (famous last words!), but I wanted to consult It /may/ be doable, but not without a lot