On 15.04.2012 04:23, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'd like us to consider switching to /var/lib/www for FHS compliance.
> This does have the significant drawback of breaking backward compatibility
> to at least some extent, but it's FHS-compliant (or at least is as good as
> we're going to get for a defau
On 04/15/2012 07:21 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> That's what you get with silly partitioning. :p
I'm not sure if this is supposed to be a joke, but if it is, it's not
really funny (because it's been re-occurring so many times).
Each time there's a change proposed that will affect people with a
On 04/15/2012 08:25 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
> Thus, to summarize once again: I'd like to change the default directory
> served by web servers from /var/www to /var/www/html along with
> remaining web servers in Debian.
>
> Comments?
>
I support this.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev
On Apr 15, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> packages should have a debconf question for the document root,
No, because this would require making every package significantly more
complex. Not just because of asking the question, but the configuration
files would not be conffiles anymore.
And it would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/2012 02:25 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
> /srv can't be used either as no path hierarchy is specified for
> /srv (e.g. think of /srv/www) and we really do not want to serve
> the entire /srv hierarchy as a document root either.
packages should have a
Arno Töll writes:
> Unless I'm missing something there is no better location for HTTP
> documents mentioned within the FHS. Note /srv can't be used either as no
> path hierarchy is specified for /srv (e.g. think of /srv/www) and we
> really do not want to serve the entire /srv hierarchy as a docu
6 matches
Mail list logo
