Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
>> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
>> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
>> estimate
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 13:43:05 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hope nobody will object if the report is sent in the next Misc Developer
> News :).
>
It doesn't need to be on -devel-announce. Just send it here.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
>> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
>> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
>> es
Thanks to everyone for their comments.
Thinking a little bit more, I believe writing some kind of report might be
of more use. Of course if I find something really relevant I might end up
filing a couple of bugs (I remember seeing something that looked like a
library name being changed in the reb
On 15/07/08 at 10:33 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > > because there are some manpage warnings that
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> > lintian.d.o's results or the
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi
> * MBF based on the issues found (when lintian reports more issues on the
> rebuilt package) [1] .
No
MBF shouldn't be done for lintian warnings/errors unless the particular
warning/error is discussed on d-devel and the consensus is that it's
worth to MBF
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
> estimate the number of affected packa
On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
> estimate the number of affected
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 08:58:56PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > [2] Haven't found any example of these, yet.
>
> Here's one:
>
> $ \diff -u xabacus_7.1.7-1_i386.lintian xabacus_7.1.7-1+b1_i386.lintian
> --- xabacus_7.1.7-1_i386.lintian2008-07-12 20:52:30.00
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> [2] Haven't found any example of these, yet.
Here's one:
$ \diff -u xabacus_7.1.7-1_i386.lintian xabacus_7.1.7-1+b1_i386.lintian
--- xabacus_7.1.7-1_i386.lintian2008-07-12 20:52:30.0 -0500
+++ xabacus_7.1.7-1+b1_i386.lintian 2008-07-12 20:52:38.00
11 matches
Mail list logo
