On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:26 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > The prompts about configuration files could probably be handled by
> > having something like a new /usr/share/bug file listing
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:37:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> First solution: change the scripts to use a bash function instead of cat
>>> <>> keep going using a FIFO to deal with t
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Come on, we are not trying to imitate Vista. Why do you need to ask
>> tons of questions just to report a bug? Their only purpose is to
>> confuse the guy reporting a bug and who doesn???t
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Come on, we are not trying to imitate Vista. Why do you need to ask tons
> of questions just to report a bug? Their only purpose is to confuse the
> guy reporting a bug and who doesn???t know what this /etc/apt/sources.list
> file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:03:14 +0100
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Making everything have to conform to GUI requirements is also
> non-friendly. reportbug must still be usable over SSH without requiring
> SSH -X. IMHO the GUI requirements
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 19:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 18:03 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > > Reportbug is ok with text and urwid (which also stops curses and
> > > switches to text), but the coming GTK+ interface won't support it.
> >
> > Then the GTK+ front
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 18:03 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > Reportbug is ok with text and urwid (which also stops curses and
> > switches to text), but the coming GTK+ interface won't support it.
>
> Then the GTK+ frontend is broken and should be fixed so that it can
> support the existi
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 19:08 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 17:09 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > > The second solution is to specify that these scripts should not be
> > > interactive. I don’t think there is much point in it, and it would
> > > simplify things a lo
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 17:09 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > The second solution is to specify that these scripts should not be
> > interactive. I don’t think there is much point in it, and it would
> > simplify things a lot.
>
> We've been here before. Some people might value the opportu
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 18:21 +0200, Luca Bruno wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:09:26 +0100
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:35 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 14:39 +0200, Luca Bruno a écrit :
> > > > The proposal:
> > > > I kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:09:26 +0100
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:35 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 14:39 +0200, Luca Bruno a écrit :
> > > The proposal:
> > > I know it's bad to br
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:37:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > First solution: change the scripts to use a bash function instead of cat
> > < > keep going using a FIFO to deal with the UI
> > Second solution: I don't know,
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:35 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 14:39 +0200, Luca Bruno a écrit :
> > The proposal:
> > I know it's bad to break compatibility but I also think keeping things
> > with hacks and far from the GUI prospective can become obsolete and
> > non us
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First solution: change the scripts to use a bash function instead of cat
> < keep going using a FIFO to deal with the UI
> Second solution: I don't know, I'm asking to you
I'd suggest reviewing all the scripts in use and de
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 14:39 +0200, Luca Bruno a écrit :
> The proposal:
> I know it's bad to break compatibility but I also think keeping things
> with hacks and far from the GUI prospective can become obsolete and
> non user-friendly.
>
> First solution: change the scripts to use a bash fu
15 matches
Mail list logo
