Re: CGI bug scripts

2000-09-11 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 04:56:29PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that > > we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's > > using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've writt

Re: CGI bug scripts

2000-09-11 Thread Joey Hess
Julian Gilbey wrote: > Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that > we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's > using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written > scripts which I use under mod_perl and the time difference is

Re: CGI bug scripts

2000-08-30 Thread James A. Treacy
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Anthony, > > > > Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that > > we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's > >

Re: CGI bug scripts

2000-08-30 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Anthony, > > Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that > we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's > using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written > script