On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There is a libapache-mod-pam, which enables apache auth using PAM
> > modules, already packaged. It has some drawbacks due to permissions
> > (apache runs as www-data so it cannot acce
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is a libapache-mod-pam, which enables apache auth using PAM
> modules, already packaged. It has some drawbacks due to permissions
> (apache runs as www-data so it cannot access /etc/shadow). This can't
> be avoided however.
Um, doesn't libpwdb take c
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 05:56:32PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > "BenC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BenC> This is just a little reminder concerning PAMification of
> BenC> potato. I want to urge all maintainers who's programs do any
> BenC> sort of authentication or account
> "BenC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BenC> This is just a little reminder concerning PAMification of
BenC> potato. I want to urge all maintainers who's programs do any
BenC> sort of authentication or account management to seek PAM patches
BenC> (or just enabling PAM if the progr
4 matches
Mail list logo
