On 2014-10-16 10:23, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
The mails to the @buildd addresses are of course private to those
behind the
list, so the peanut gallery on -devel can't see what tg wrote nor judge
for
ourselves whether it was whiny or not, but characterising it as such
here is
not helpful. TG's ma
On 2014-10-16 10:10, Andreas Barth wrote:
Wrong again, I dist-upgraded the chroots and gave back the package.
But as before, facts are difficult.
FWIW, you did not update neither the d-d nor the buildd.d.o thread about
that. Which means that the other people think that it's still open.
Kind
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > But it’s now resolved, thanks Philipp!
> >
> > Wrong again, I dist-upgraded the chroots and gave back the package.
> > But as before, facts are difficult.
>
> Likewise, you could have pointed this out without being quite so condecending.
Uhm ye
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:10:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> You didn't ask a wider audience, you whined to one, and that on
> something totally unrelated to the thing you really wanted.
The mails to the @buildd addresses are of course private to those behind the
list, so the peanut gallery on
* Thorsten Glaser (t.gla...@tarent.de) [141016 09:39]:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > Buildd administration — @buildd.debian.org
> > lists a couple of people. And also a working mail address. Contacting
> > people via a role account is always prefered.
>
> Yeah, that’s whom I
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Buildd administration — @buildd.debian.org
> lists a couple of people. And also a working mail address. Contacting
> people via a role account is always prefered.
Yeah, that’s whom I contacted first, on Friday. It was just not
getting any sort of respo
* Paul Wise (p...@debian.org) [141015 17:22]:
> [ powerpc buildd admins ]
> According to LDAP it appears to be wouter, he, pkern.
This list is incomplete. There are more people, especially there is a
group who is buildd admin on all buildds, and tends to fix problems if
they are known. (However, t
* Thorsten Glaser (t...@mirbsd.de) [141013 12:05]:
> sbuild/buildd runs apt-get update, but not apt-get *upgrade,
> before each build. But I assume this should not be changed
> either…
>
> So we need either a technical, or a policy-ical, or a human,
> solution to this problem, right?
Or we just h
* Thorsten Glaser (t.gla...@tarent.de) [141015 16:20]:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Thorsten Glaser (2014-10-15):
> > > Who are powerpc buildd admins, again?
> >
> > Still listed at the same location since last time you asked:
>
> Yeah, I tend to forget it.
>
> > https
Hi Thorsten,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:05:21PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[...]
> from dak, because the version is neither in testing (yet or
> still) and not in unstable (any more) and so not known to
> dak. The buildd admins do not react on this and happily
> ignore eMails asking them, polit
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> https://www.debian.org/intro/organization
>
> Ah wonderful, a set of 0 people. No surprise then.
Unfortunately that page is maintained manually.
According to LDAP it appears to be wouter, h
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser (2014-10-15):
> > Who are powerpc buildd admins, again?
>
> Still listed at the same location since last time you asked:
Yeah, I tend to forget it.
> https://www.debian.org/intro/organization
Ah wonderful, a set of 0 people. No s
Thorsten Glaser (2014-10-15):
> Who are powerpc buildd admins, again?
Still listed at the same location since last time you asked:
https://www.debian.org/intro/organization
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg00446.html
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Wookey wrote:
> I _think_ we don't do this because the upgrading uses a lot of time on
> buildds, especially slow ones. I did do this (build in snapshot,
Right.
> the same packages over and over until the snapshot was updated (which
> was manual and done approx weekly). This
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:17:19AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Thorsten Glaser [2014-10-13 12:05 +0200]:
> > sbuild/buildd runs apt-get update, but not apt-get *upgrade,
> > before each build. But I assume this should not be changed
> > either…
>
> I _think_ we don't do this because the upgrading u
+++ Thorsten Glaser [2014-10-13 12:05 +0200]:
> Hi all,
>
>
> sbuild/buildd runs apt-get update, but not apt-get *upgrade,
> before each build. But I assume this should not be changed
> either…
I _think_ we don't do this because the upgrading uses a lot of time on
buildds, especially slow ones.
16 matches
Mail list logo
