Re: Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-26 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:55:19PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote: > > - I did not verify that the new .orig.tar.gz is indeed genuine > > md5sums are identical with upstream's tarball, I just double checked. > > > - the following duplicates the c

Re: Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote: > - I did not verify that the new .orig.tar.gz is indeed genuine md5sums are identical with upstream's tarball, I just double checked. > - the following duplicates the call to fix_www_data_perm for > /var/cache/bugzilla, and in addition, this chan

Re: Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-20 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:05:45AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In linux.debian.devel, you wrote: > > It came to my attention that the 'bugzilla' Debian package is currently > > not in Sarge, due to several RC bugs. > > > > If you consider this package worthy of inclusion in Sarge (note that

Re: Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote: > It came to my attention that the 'bugzilla' Debian package is currently > not in Sarge, due to several RC bugs. > > If you consider this package worthy of inclusion in Sarge (note that is > is in woody, so not shipping it in Sarge would be a regression, and > le