Re: Bugs filed in unexpected places

2012-11-04 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Hello Andrei and all, On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:24:59 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > The discussion about ITO made me think: wouldn't it make more sense to > also have RFH, RFA, and O filled against the package itself and not > wnpp? One has to be quite familiar with Debian to check wnpp for RFH,

Re: Bugs filed in unexpected places

2012-10-26 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > An immediate solution would probably be to 'affects ' so > the bugs at least shows up on the package's bug page. Maybe the BTS > could/should do this automatically? Doing affects automatically isn't really something that the BTS itself should do,[1] but

Re: Bugs filed in unexpected places

2012-10-26 Thread Simon Paillard
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 03:38:03PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Le 26/10/2012 15:24, Andrei POPESCU a écrit : > > The discussion about ITO made me think: wouldn't it make more sense > > to also have RFH, RFA, and O filled against the package itself and > > not wnpp? One has to be quite familiar

Re: Bugs filed in unexpected places

2012-10-26 Thread Jon Dowland
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 07:39:52PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Vi, 26 oct 12, 15:38:03, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > > > > it is currently showed in the PTS: e.g. > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/alevt.html: > > "problems > > How many non-DDs/DMs do you think are aware of the PTS? My guess i

Re: Bugs filed in unexpected places

2012-10-26 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 26 oct 12, 15:38:03, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > > it is currently showed in the PTS: e.g. > http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/alevt.html: > "problems How many non-DDs/DMs do you think are aware of the PTS? My guess is: not that many. IMVHO the BTS is much more visible, especially to users who

Re: Bugs filed in unexpected places

2012-10-26 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Thibaut Paumard [121026 15:54]: > I don't see a reason to move it away from wnpp: its great to have a > central place for that information, but I agree it is useful to have > the info forwarded to other places (such as the PTS, and perhaps the > package's own bug page). Having a central page to

Re: Bugs filed in unexpected places

2012-10-26 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 26/10/2012 15:24, Andrei POPESCU a écrit : > Hi all, > > The discussion about ITO made me think: wouldn't it make more sense > to also have RFH, RFA, and O filled against the package itself and > not wnpp? One has to be quite familiar with Debian