Re: Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-21 Thread Christoph Martin
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Christoph Martin wrote: > > So, what is the policy to do with a package for the "testing" > > distribution, if there is an important bug? Do you remove the package > > unconditionaly or do you try investigate (like in the rc buglist) if > > the bug really

Re: Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-17 Thread Joey Hess
Christoph Martin wrote: > So, what is the policy to do with a package for the "testing" > distribution, if there is an important bug? Do you remove the package > unconditionaly or do you try investigate (like in the rc buglist) if > the bug really applies? Well if I were AJ I would just mechanical

Re: Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-17 Thread Christoph Martin
Joey Hess writes: > Christoph Martin wrote: > > We have a problem with the bug tracking system as long as we can't > > really find out to which versions of a package a bug really > > applies. We only mosttimes have the version of the packages where a > > problem showed up. But we don't know if

Re: Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-16 Thread Joey Hess
Christoph Martin wrote: > We have a problem with the bug tracking system as long as we can't > really find out to which versions of a package a bug really > applies. We only mosttimes have the version of the packages where a > problem showed up. But we don't know if the bug was introduced with > th