Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Christoph Martin wrote:
> > So, what is the policy to do with a package for the "testing"
> > distribution, if there is an important bug? Do you remove the package
> > unconditionaly or do you try investigate (like in the rc buglist) if
> > the bug really
Christoph Martin wrote:
> So, what is the policy to do with a package for the "testing"
> distribution, if there is an important bug? Do you remove the package
> unconditionaly or do you try investigate (like in the rc buglist) if
> the bug really applies?
Well if I were AJ I would just mechanical
Joey Hess writes:
> Christoph Martin wrote:
> > We have a problem with the bug tracking system as long as we can't
> > really find out to which versions of a package a bug really
> > applies. We only mosttimes have the version of the packages where a
> > problem showed up. But we don't know if
Christoph Martin wrote:
> We have a problem with the bug tracking system as long as we can't
> really find out to which versions of a package a bug really
> applies. We only mosttimes have the version of the packages where a
> problem showed up. But we don't know if the bug was introduced with
> th
4 matches
Mail list logo