On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:10:22PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Life for the maintainer or for the user?
Well, the severity of a bug, from a user POV, makes no guarantee on
how serious the maintainer takes it, nor whether they will actually
fix it. Admittely some users get comfort from being
On 2013-06-10 23:28:28 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > This is important for apt-listbugs, which takes into account RC bugs by
> > default
> Which too is not ideal: for example, I don't think users should care about
> such RC
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:40:17PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > > > It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply
> ignores
> > > > bug severities entirely. Of course harder to do nearer to release, but
> > > > we live in a time of relative luxury right now…
> > >
> > > This is i
On Jun 10, 2013 1:28 PM, "Andrey Rahmatullin" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply
ignores
> > > bug severities entirely. Of course harder to do nearer to release, but
> > > we live in a ti
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply ignores
> > bug severities entirely. Of course harder to do nearer to release, but
> > we live in a time of relative luxury right now…
>
> This is important for apt-
Vincent Lefevre writes ("Re: Bug severity and private data disclosure"):
> Note that this is a regression. Using the testing version (= stable
> currently) is fine w.r.t. this bug.
Oh, I see. In that case I agree with you. Have you asked the release
team ? They are the right
On 2013-06-10 17:16:12 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Since you seem concerned about apt-listbugs, make it support listing
> security bugs (optionally with a given severity threshold, so as to
> ignore minor or normal bug reports tagged security), and there you go.
>
> [ From a quick look at the
Vincent Lefevre (10/06/2013):
> I reported a bug involving private data disclosure, more precisely,
> on some network, when printing a file with CUPS 1.6, the file is
> printed on a wrong printer[*]. The bug severity was downgraded to
> important (i.e. non-RC), despite the obvious security problem
Hi Ian,
Le lundi, 10 juin 2013 16.11:26, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> (I have CC'd cups-client@packages.)
(I'd prefer the discussion to happen on the bug.)
> I'm not sure exactly what consequences you think should have flowed
> from the bug's RC severity. Do you think the release should have been
>
On 2013-06-10 15:11:26 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I agree with you that that bug is a potential security vulnerability.
> I think the maintainer adopted an overly-close and legalistic reading
> of the bug severity guidelines. On the other hand I think the
> maintainer makes good points about the
On 2013-06-10 15:05:05 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply ignores
> bug severities entirely. Of course harder to do nearer to release, but
> we live in a time of relative luxury right now…
This is important for apt-listbugs, which takes
(I have CC'd cups-client@packages.)
Vincent Lefevre writes ("Bug severity and private data disclosure"):
> I reported a bug involving private data disclosure, more precisely,
> on some network, when printing a file with CUPS 1.6, the file is
> printed on a wrong printer[*]. The bug severity was do
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply ignores
> bug severities entirely.
Life for the maintainer or for the user?
--
WBR, wRAR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply ignores
bug severities entirely. Of course harder to do nearer to release, but
we live in a time of relative luxury right now…
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I reported a bug involving private data disclosure, more precisely,
> on some network, when printing a file with CUPS 1.6, the file is
> printed on a wrong printer[*]. The bug severity was downgraded to
> important (i.e. non-RC), despite th
15 matches
Mail list logo
