On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:43:56AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The problem to be solved is that ISVs provide binaries for Linux i386
> and our users want to run them on amd64. LSB, x32 and ARM are
> completely irrelevant - the important thing is to make it easy to
> install whatever libraries th
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:35:43PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:59:02PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > You installed a 32-bit application on a 64-bit system. That will only
> > work if you also install the 32-bit supporting libraries, including the
> > dynamic linker. Th
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:59:02PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> You installed a 32-bit application on a 64-bit system. That will only
> work if you also install the 32-bit supporting libraries, including the
> dynamic linker. This is not a bug in Debian.
>
> And no, installing 32-bit libraries by
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:26:46AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >>> Debian clearly says: "File does not exist", while in fact it DOES EXIST.
> >>> This is a 100% proof of Debian bug.
>
> > I guess it is bash telling you that.
>
> >> That's the error message that you get when the dynamic loader fo
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:26:46AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> That's the error message that you get when the dynamic loader for a
> >> binary doesn't exist. I think that's been the case for as long as
> >> Linux has existed.
> > That's already reported as bug #609882.
> I think that's askin
Timo Weingärtner writes:
> Hallo Russ Allbery,
>> I think that's asking quite a lot of bash. Wouldn't it have to open
>> the binary and parse the ELF headers, extracting the INTERP header, in
>> order to verify that? Does it really make sense to encode
>> understanding of ELF binary layout form
Hallo Russ Allbery,
2013-01-03 um 19:26:46 schriebst Du:
> Timo Weingärtner writes:
> > 2013-01-03 um 18:32:28 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> >> Alexey Eromenko writes:
> >>> User error? Huh ?
> >>>
> >>> No ! This is a Debian Bug !
> >>> Debian clearly says: "File does not exist", while in fact it DO
Timo Weingärtner writes:
> 2013-01-03 um 18:32:28 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>> Alexey Eromenko writes:
>>> User error? Huh ?
>>> No ! This is a Debian Bug !
>>> Debian clearly says: "File does not exist", while in fact it DOES EXIST.
>>> This is a 100% proof of Debian bug.
> I guess it is bash tel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 697270 -1
Bug #697270 {Done: Holger Levsen } [general] PC 32-bit
programs fails to work on amd64
Bug 697270 cloned as bug 697299
> retitle -1 misleading error message when ELF interpreter does not exist
Bug #697299 {Done: Holger Levsen } [g
Holger Levsen writes:
> Hi Gergely,
>
> if you take the effort to reassign to general, why dont you lower the
> severity
> as well?
>
> And, if you explain how this is a user error, why dont you close it straight
> away?
Because I haven't slept this year yet, and I forgot to change the Cc: to
Hi Gergelzz :-)
On Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2013, Gergelzz Nagy wrote:
> Because I haven't slept this year yet, and I forgot to change the Cc: to
> -done@, and there's been about 5 minutes between the Control: header and
> the rest of my mail, during which I completely forgot about th
Hi Gergely,
if you take the effort to reassign to general, why dont you lower the severity
as well?
And, if you explain how this is a user error, why dont you close it straight
away?
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 general
Bug #697270 [kernel-image] PC 32-bit programs fails to work on amd64
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image'
Bug reassigned from package 'kernel-image' to 'general'.
No longer marked as found in versions 3.2.0.
Ignoring request to alter fixed vers
13 matches
Mail list logo
