On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 05:02:03PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> No, I meant that you might build a single binary package that would
> contain the grsec-patched source. That would encourage building custom
> kernels with build-time randomisation. I understand that's not the way
> you want to go.
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 17:34 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 22:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
[...]
> > The options I see are:
> > - Provide a source package based on src:linux that includes only the
> >
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 22:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> [...]
> > NOTE: I don't want to dismiss Mempo attempts, especially the
> > reproducible build part, and I also think it's valuable to provide our
> > users a grsec kernel a
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 22:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
[...]
> NOTE: I don't want to dismiss Mempo attempts, especially the
> reproducible build part, and I also think it's valuable to provide our
> users a grsec kernel as part of the distribution, just that I prefered
> to go the featureset w
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:30:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 05:28 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> > On 17/04/14 00:23, Aaron Zauner wrote:
> > > Now shipping grsec is a really good idea. I'd like to see that as well.
> >
> > There has been an attempt to provid
5 matches
Mail list logo
