Am 16.11.2010 15:15, schrieb liang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: celt051
Version: 0.5.1.3
Upstream Author: Christopher Montgomery, Jean-Marc Valin
Timothy Terrib
Add Cc to spice-devel list
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Adrian Knoth
wrote:
> Ok, you'll lose backward compatibility to non-celt-0.9 installations
> already deployed and not being able to update... but who's using them?
> And who will be using them by 2011?
>
RHEL6 and fedora are using spice
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 22:11 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, there's
>
>http://www.spice-space.org/docs/spice_protocol.pdf
>
> and it says it's a draft, so I guess it can still be reworked. But
> still, if you see section 7 and 8, you'll notice two constants:
>
>RED_PLAYBACK_DA
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:08:02PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hi!
[CELT for spice]
> Yeah I am aware of the celt _madness_ - I am one of the mumble
> maintainers..
>
> spice then has to be adjusted to support celt 0.9.
I strongly support this demand. It was wrong to use CELT in the first
plac
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:08:02PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 16.11.2010 16:09, schrieb Liang Guo:
>>>
>>> celt is already packaged:
>>> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=celt
>>
>> Different version CELT is not compatiable, it means, if audio is
>> encoded with celt 0.5, it is not
>
>
> Yeah I am aware of the celt _madness_ - I am one of the mumble maintainers..
>
> spice then has to be adjusted to support celt 0.9.
It is hard to upgrade to a new celt version, after upgrade, new client
will not able
to connect to old spice server.
So it is not a good idea to update celt fre
Am 16.11.2010 16:43, schrieb Marc-André Lureau:
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 16.11.2010 16:09, schrieb Liang Guo:
Marc-André Lureau had ported spice to use the latest celt , but it is
not suitable for upstream, for the spice client and the server use
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 16.11.2010 16:09, schrieb Liang Guo:
>> Marc-André Lureau had ported spice to use the latest celt , but it is
>> not suitable for upstream, for the spice client and the server use
>> different different bitstream format.
>>
Am 16.11.2010 16:09, schrieb Liang Guo:
celt is already packaged:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=celt
Different version CELT is not compatiable, it means, if audio is
encoded with celt 0.5, it is not possible to decode it with celt 0.9,
and spice[1] uses celt 0.5.1, if we want use
>
> celt is already packaged:
> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=celt
Different version CELT is not compatiable, it means, if audio is
encoded with celt 0.5, it is not possible to decode it with celt 0.9,
and spice[1] uses celt 0.5.1, if we want use spice in Debian, we need
package celt0
10 matches
Mail list logo
