On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 08:25:33PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:39:02PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> > I wonder who many people use the word "Coran" for Qur'an in English. If
> > this is quite frequent, you might want insert this synonym somewhere in
> > the descrip
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:39:02PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 23:18 +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> > * Package name: othman
> > * License : Waqf Public License
> > Description : electronic Quran browser
> >
> > Othman electronic Quran browser displays Qu
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:39:02PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> I wonder who many people use the word "Coran" for Qur'an in English. If
> this is quite frequent, you might want insert this synonym somewhere in
> the description.
In my experience, it's either "Qur'an" or "Koran." I think Gunnar
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 23:18 +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> * Package name: othman
> * License : Waqf Public License
> Description : electronic Quran browser
>
> Othman electronic Quran browser displays Quranic text in Othmani script style
> as written under authority of Othman i
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:24:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Without getting deeper in the licensing of Othman itself, would you
> consider the text of the Coran itself to be DFSG-free? I _think_ that
> any religious text can only be distributed verbatim, not modified in
> any way - That is compl
Hi,
could you plese change
othman -- electronic Quran browser in Python
into
othman -- electronic Quran browser
or is there any reason that the Quran can better browsed with Python
than any other programming language?
Thanks
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
أحمد المحمودي dijo [Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +0300]:
> On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > "Harm others" is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of
> > activities usually considered ok[1].
>
> I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. That
Hi,
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 02:19:03PM +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> > Clear or vague, if they stick to a license that restricts usage, then
> > it fails DFSG #6.
> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html, for
> > example, for a quite similar case.
> Yes, but it can be p
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 01:04:26PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Clear or vague, if they stick to a license that restricts usage, then
> it fails DFSG #6.
> See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html, for
> example, for a quite similar case.
---end quoted text---
Yes, but it can
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > "Harm others" is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of
> > activities usually considered ok[1].
>
> I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. Th
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> "Harm others" is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of
> activities usually considered ok[1].
I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. That license terms
need to be clear not vague.
> This fails the DFSG, unl
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:18:34PM +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> * Package name: othman
> Description : electronic Quran browser
> * URL : http://othman.ojuba.org
> * License : Waqf Public License
http://www.ojuba.org/wiki/waqf/license
While I do like the preamble of
12 matches
Mail list logo
