On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > For the root-system binaries, there is of course the option to link with
> > RPATH set. However, I believe that the Policy actually forbids this.
> I see no reason why policy should forbid rpath's for that case.
For the standard
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:41:09PM +0200, Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > I understand this issue, but putting libMatrix in /usr/lib/root avoid file
> > conflict with other package, do not address the problem of library name
> > conflict at run-time.
> Agreed. Suppose you have packages bar
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:43:16PM +0200, Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
>> This could be very bad for the root-system package set. ROOT has
>> libraries named like libMatrix, libPostscript, libPhysics, libMath,
>> and so on - i.e., very general names. For that reason I
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:43:16PM +0200, Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
>
> This could be very bad for the root-system package set. ROOT has
> libraries named like libMatrix, libPostscript, libPhysics, libMath, and
> so on - i.e., very general names. For that reason I moved all the
> packa
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:41:09PM +0200, Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> Yes and no. If bar and baz had put libfoo.so.1 in /usr/lib/bar
> and /usr/lib/baz respectively, one could at least install both packages
> at the same time without any conflict. If a user needed to use baz's
> libfoo.so
Hi again,
Let me first clear up a confusion:
I agree that putting a library in a sub-directory does not disambiguate
ld.so searches. If libFoo.so.1 exists in both /usr/lib/bar
and /usr/lib/baz and both these directories are in the ld.so search path
(one way or another), then there is an ambig
Darren Salt writes:
> Perhaps this?
>
> * Install the binaries in /usr/lib/root.
> * Provide wrappers such as the following in /usr/bin:
>
> #! /bin/sh -e
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/root"${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:}$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}"
> exec /usr/lib/root/"$(basename "$0")" "$@"
It's genera
I demand that Bill Allombert may or may not have written...
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:43:16PM +0200, Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 21:25 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[snip]
>> ROOT has libraries named like libMatrix, libPostscript, libPhysics,
>> libMath, and so on -
Christian Holm Christensen writes:
> This could be very bad for the root-system package set. ROOT has
> libraries named like libMatrix, libPostscript, libPhysics, libMath, and
> so on - i.e., very general names. For that reason I moved all the
> packages into the subdirectory /usr/lib/root to
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:43:16PM +0200, Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 21:25 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > In Policy Bug#519941, it was proposed to remove the Policy permission
> > for packages to modify ld.so.conf in exceptional circumstances. The
> > im
Hi all,
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 21:25 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> In Policy Bug#519941, it was proposed to remove the Policy permission
> for packages to modify ld.so.conf in exceptional circumstances. The
> implication would be that all packages which do this will need to either
> move their libr
11 matches
Mail list logo
