On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Seems that there is something wrong with dpkg-source. Why would it require
> a - instead of a _ for the orig.tar.gz when all the other files for the
> package have a _.
I suppose that's because a `-' is used in most other places, gnu for
example.
Why does dpkg-source not simply change those names so that they work? Who
can remember all these detail. The orig.tar.gz name is already artificial
and not original. The original archive uses capital letters that debian
does not like very much.
And why does it work for the debianized directory?
N
On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Seems that there is something wrong with dpkg-source. Why would it require
> a - instead of a _ for the orig.tar.gz when all the other files for the
> package have a _.
>
Because dpkg-source strictly enforces the current naming conventions.
Since th
On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Seems that there is something wrong with dpkg-source. Why would it require
> a - instead of a _ for the orig.tar.gz when all the other files for the
> package have a _.
>
I'm not really sure why Ian did it that way.
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The
Seems that there is something wrong with dpkg-source. Why would it require
a - instead of a _ for the orig.tar.gz when all the other files for the
package have a _.
On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, llucius wrote:
llucius>Package: dhcpd
llucius>Version: 0.5.13-1
llucius>
llucius>The following message was rece
5 matches
Mail list logo
