Felipe Sateler wrote:
> But oldstable has 2.86.ds1-1. I thought that only direct upgrades were
> supported. I guess the conditional is indeed redundant.
It may be, but keeping backwards compatibility in this case can't hurt
much. Although I'd like to hear other opinions on this.
--
·''`.
Felipe Sateler wrote:
Juan Céspedes wrote:
invoke-rc.d is present since version 2.80-1 of sysvinit; maybe someone
could have a modern package with a very old sysvinit, and thus without
invoke-rc.d
But oldstable has 2.86.ds1-1. I thought that only direct upgrades were
supported. I guess the co
Juan Céspedes wrote:
> On 8/24/07, David Claughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Amaya wrote:
>> >
>> > if which invoke-rc.d >/dev/null 2>&1; then
>> > invoke-rc.d package
>> > else
>> > /etc/init.d/package
>> > fi
>>
>> I don't want to be a pest (given I'm no
On 8/24/07, David Claughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amaya wrote:
> >
> > if which invoke-rc.d >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> > invoke-rc.d package
> > else
> > /etc/init.d/package
> > fi
>
> I don't want to be a pest (given I'm not a developer or maintainer), but
Amaya wrote:
In most cases the fix should be simple, replace this:
/etc/init.d/package
with this:
if which invoke-rc.d >/dev/null 2>&1; then
invoke-rc.d package
else
/etc/init.d/package
fi
Hi,
I don't want to be a pest (given I'm not
5 matches
Mail list logo
