Re: Bug#4329: Emacs has hardcoded path for jka-compr, breaks at upgrade

1996-09-02 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Rob Browning: > Why in the world wouldn't you want to require 4 digits for the date? Because of all the usual bad reasons, and one good one: it doesn't matter. The LSM dates are always past tense, and making the new requirement is trivial, all of thirty seconds of coding. Converting all old date

Re: Bug#4329: Emacs has hardcoded path for jka-compr, breaks at upgrade

1996-09-02 Thread Lars Wirzenius
This is really off-topic, but it's one of my pet peeves. Sorry. Rob Browning: > 5) Debian should use either the big or little endian format and always > use four digits for the year. That way we won't have trouble when the > millenium hits, and you can always tell by looking if it's big or > litt

Re: Bug#4329: Emacs has hardcoded path for jka-compr, breaks at upgrade

1996-09-01 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Sat, 31 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote: > [1] Yes, I know it was probably deliberate, but American middle-endian > date-formats are stupid and confusing and I want them stamped out. > You have better things to do than to stamp about for the rest of your life. Also, you will never get anyone's att