Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:58:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > ok, we are hooked into the libflac6 transition, let's start the curl one. > > > my wish is to upload curl 7.14.1 with the following package layout: > > > -

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:16:28 +0200]: > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3) > So the libcurl3 in sarge and etch will have ABI incompatibilities? If done right, I see no reason this should be

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > ok, we are hooked into the libflac6 transition, let's start the curl one. > my wish is to upload curl 7.14.1 with the following package layout: > - curl (OpenSSL, linked to libcurl-openssl.so.3) > - libcurl3

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:16:28 +0200]: > - libcurl3-dev (OpenSSL, depends: libssl-dev) > - libcurl3-openssl-dev (GnuTLS, depends: libgnutls-dev) Obvious typo/whatever here, right? > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3) So the libcurl3 in sarg

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:40:17PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 the mental interface of Daniel Stenberg told: > > > > The problem you have with libcurl and OpenSSL/GnuTLS is not strictly an > > "upstream problem". > > > > In the curl project there are some ideas floa

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 30, Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my view, there's only one available work-around for the short to mid > term, and that is to use a separate .so file for libcurl built with GnuTLS. We know that in the long term we want to use gnutls. So why should it not be the default fo

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-01 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: I bounced this message to debian-devel to force a solution with the curl ssl/gnutlds diverties. ... My resume on Daniels point of view is to get a different .so name for gnutls in the very short term and kick off ssl in Debian apps midterm! Tha

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Hi all, I bounced this message to debian-devel to force a solution with the curl ssl/gnutlds diverties. On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 the mental interface of Daniel Stenberg told: > Hi > > The problem you have with libcurl and OpenSSL/GnuTLS is not strictly an > "upstream problem". > > In the curl pro