Re: Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:55:01 +0200, Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Arnaud, Yo Andreas, [...] > At least this particular bug occurs on all arches. It is not very nice > to have to read, understand and manually change 'debian/rule

Re: Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-28 Thread Andreas Jochens
Hello Steve, On 05-Apr-28 02:56, Steve Langasek wrote: > by Debian, so I don't think it's fair to require that contrib java packages > be buildable with any particular j2sdk package. > > By all means, please keep filing (and fixing) bugs so that we can get as > many contrib packages as possible a

Re: Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-Apr-27 23:07, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > Thanks for your bug reports, but you have to know that you can't file > > FTBFS bugs reports about packages that are in contrib and relay on > > packages that are not in Debian to build!

Re: Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-28 Thread Andreas Jochens
Hello Arnaud, On 05-Apr-27 23:07, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Thanks for your bug reports, but you have to know that you can't file > FTBFS bugs reports about packages that are in contrib and relay on > packages that are not in Debian to build! > The non-free JDK's are not officially supported so the