On 21-Apr-05, 05:12 (CDT), Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why re-write cron when cron only needs a minor change?
>
> I'm afraid I again can't follow your thinking.
I'm pretty sure that he was only talking about implementing @reboot in
bcron, rather than requiring a whole new system
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 11:45:24AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 14 April 2005 20:05, Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While I think that user specific services are useful, I don't think cron
> > is the right place for that. The init system should support user-owned
> > servi
On Thursday 14 April 2005 20:05, Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > automatically starting a screen session at startup?
>
> While I think that user specific services are useful, I don't think cron
> is the right place for that. The init system should support user-owned
> services and an in
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:50:16PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > what about the "@reboot" extension? I think that's a really neat feature.
> >
> > /etc/rdS.d
> >
> > I know, tha
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why "@daily" is
> > > significantly easier than "0 0
On 10-Apr-05, 16:30 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see plenty : I have a mini daemon on one of my accounts that I really
> need. but since I'm not root on the machine, I need to be able to use
> @reboot to restart
No you don't. See my reply to Wesley.
Steve
--
Steve
On 10-Apr-05, 14:24 (CDT), "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know, that's not accessible to users, only the admin. OTOH, I can't
> > think of any really good reason that user needs to do something
> > *automatically* on reboot.
>
> Perhaps user-run services?
So run a script e
> I know, that's not accessible to users, only the admin. OTOH, I can't
> think of any really good reason that user needs to do something
> *automatically* on reboot.
I see plenty : I have a mini daemon on one of my accounts that I really
need. but since I'm not root on the machine, I need to be
On Sunday 10 April 2005 12:08, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why "@daily" is
> > > significantly easier than
On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why "@daily" is
> > significantly easier than "0 0 * * *" but apparently some people get all
> > sweaty
On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why "@daily" is
> significantly easier than "0 0 * * *" but apparently some people get all
> sweaty if they have to type an asterisk.
what about the "@reboot" extension? I think th
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:27:27PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2005, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > This is bcron, a new cron system designed with secure operations in mind.
>
> Neat! Any chance of adding fcron-like functionality? I got used to its very
> advanced anacronis
On 07-Apr-05, 12:24 (CDT), Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looking at the site, it appears to have the required functionality
> > (/etc/cron.d, etc.). One line item that is not yet supported is @reboot,
> > @daily, etc.
>
> Correct. I checked that it provides the functionality mandate
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> This is bcron, a new cron system designed with secure operations in mind.
Neat! Any chance of adding fcron-like functionality? I got used to its very
advanced anacronistic-cron capabilities.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One di
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 07:35:25AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 07-Apr-05, 06:40 (CDT), Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:45:15 +, Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >This is bcron, a new cron system designed with secure operations in mind.
> > >
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 05:47:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 06-Apr-05, 14:45 (CDT), Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There'll be two binary packages: bcron, containing the bcron programs
> > and documentation, and bcron-run, setting up the bcron services, and
> > providing, rep
On 07-Apr-05, 06:40 (CDT), Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:45:15 +, Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >This is bcron, a new cron system designed with secure operations in mind.
> >To do this, the system is divided into several separate programs, each
> >r
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:45:15 +, Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>This is bcron, a new cron system designed with secure operations in mind.
>To do this, the system is divided into several separate programs, each
>responsible for a separate task, with strictly controlled communications
>bet
On 06-Apr-05, 14:45 (CDT), Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There'll be two binary packages: bcron, containing the bcron programs
> and documentation, and bcron-run, setting up the bcron services, and
> providing, replacing, and conflicting with the default cron package.
It looks like
19 matches
Mail list logo
