On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:04:51 +0200
Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brent has already a packaged libical here:
> http://people.debian.org/~bfulgham/gnustep/
Yeah, but that's not in the archive :)
And even having that one it wouldn't serve, as vcalendar plugin
needs specifically the
Brent has already a packaged libical here:
http://people.debian.org/~bfulgham/gnustep/
yours,
Gürkan
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:02:51 +0200
Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Libical has been in Debian until some months ago, when it was removed from
> unstable due to buggyness and unmaintaindness.
Ok, I don't really want to introduce it again, so I've hacked plugin source
to get it compil
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:02:51 +0200
Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Ricardo Mones wrote:
>
> > * Package name: libical0
>
> Are you aware that libical is currently pretty unmaintained upstream and
> has a lot of nasty bugs? In fact all projects who needed an ical parser
> (e.g. K
Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * URL : http://www.softwarestudio.org/libical/
The last version of this appears to have been released in 2002. Is there
any sign of ongoing development, and is there any software that actually
uses this library?
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:58:01 +0100
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * URL : http://www.softwarestudio.org/libical/
>
> The last version of this appears to have been released in 2002. Is there
> any sign of ongoing development
* Ricardo Mones wrote:
> * Package name: libical0
Are you aware that libical is currently pretty unmaintained upstream and has a
lot of nasty bugs? In fact all projects who needed an ical parser (e.g. KDE
PIM, evolution, OpenGroupware.org...) all dropped libical, forked it or wrote
somethi
7 matches
Mail list logo
