On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:56:55PM +0200, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Also usable means that the program is not imagemagick. I am really sick
> of tools that read any image they should process (even for something
> simple like shrinking) in 48 bit true color into memory. The netpbm tools
> are far mo
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:40:04PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> As you said, we should make at least a silent transition. IMHO we
> should split netpbm to a netpbm-legacy (to where all the programms are
> transfered) and then substitut the programms on a step-by-step basis
> with wrappers to usabl
* Steve McIntyre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030707 16:20]:
> I realise that I may have just put off anybody who might have taken
> netpbm, but I wouldn't want to see people pick it up expecting an easy
> job. We might even be better off dropping the whole package
> completely, but for the fact that it ha
3 matches
Mail list logo
