On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thu, January 30, 2014 08:20, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On sparc, it's dies under load -- at least on smetana and spontini. Not
> > on sompek and stadler though. schroeder and lebrun are also running
> > squeeze kernels.
>
> At work we've seen r
On Thu, January 30, 2014 08:20, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On sparc, it's dies under load -- at least on smetana and spontini. Not
> on sompek and stadler though. schroeder and lebrun are also running
> squeeze kernels.
At work we've seen regular kernel panics when we upgraded two sparc
machines
On 29/01/14 at 19:41 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> "Recursive" auto-removals temporarily suspended
> ===
>
> We have received complaints that package maintainers felt surprised
> and inadequately warned, when their packages were removed due to a(n
> indi
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * Have the sparc kernels in stable fixed
>- Currently, DSA are forced to use kernels from oldstable. Probably
> anyone using sparc/Wheezy are forced to that, but so far we only
> heard complaints from DSA[1].
> [1] I forgot the actual de
]] Niels Thykier
>- To be honest, I am impressed DSA haven't just yelled "We veto
> sparc for Jessie until the stable kernels are fixed".
Apart from the yelling bit, I believe that's basically what we've done.
[...]
> Let it be no secret: If there is no visible progress on salvaging
>
On 2014-01-30 03:49, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> * sparc
>>- We have seen no improvements. Therefore, out of date
>> binaries on sparc will no longer prevent packages from
>> migrating to testing and Britney will be allowed to break
>
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * sparc
>- We have seen no improvements. Therefore, out of date
> binaries on sparc will no longer prevent packages from
> migrating to testing and Britney will be allowed to break
> existing packages in testing on sparc.
>- We
7 matches
Mail list logo
