Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2025-03-11 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 05:32:37PM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > I like that idea, thanks! It would be easy enough to add that to > Incus' $PATH while making it simple for an end user to modify their > local environment to directly use `mc` if they wish. Let me express a concern regarding this

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2025-03-08 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 06:58 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 05:32:37PM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > >    I like that idea, thanks! It would be easy enough to add that to > > Incus' $PATH while making it simple for an end user to modify their > > local environment to directl

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-24 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 9:42 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 09:28:29AM +0200 schrieb Philip Hands: > > >> /usr/libexec/minio-client/bin/mc -> /usr/bin/mcli > > > > Might I suggest that the link goes the other way, so that the symlink > > lives in /usr/bin? That way the existenc

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 09:28:29AM +0200 schrieb Philip Hands: > >> /usr/libexec/minio-client/bin/mc -> /usr/bin/mcli > > Might I suggest that the link goes the other way, so that the symlink > lives in /usr/bin? That way the existence of the lib directory is > somewhat self-documenting. Th

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-22 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.04.2024 um 18:31 schrieb Mathias Gibbens: Currently, Midnight Commander is packaged for Debian as `mc`. I am looking at packaging the MinIO Client (needed for a future release of Incus), which also unfortunately names its binary `mc`. MinIO upstream has been pretty clear that they don't

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-22 Thread Marvin Renich
* Simon McVittie [240422 05:02]: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 09:44:12 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Philip Hands writes: > > > Might I suggest that the link goes the other way, so that the symlink > > > lives in /usr/bin? That way the existence of the lib directory is > > > somewhat self-docume

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-22 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sun Apr 21, 2024 at 5:37 PM BST, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Go for it, I think that there is no good solution for this case. > Everybody who cares then will manually create a mc -> mcli symlink. Indeed, they will: so I would suggest that the chosen binary name for minio-client should *not* be mcli,

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-22 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 09:44:12 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Philip Hands writes: > > Might I suggest that the link goes the other way, so that the symlink > > lives in /usr/bin? That way the existence of the lib directory is > > somewhat self-documenting. Having the real executable in /usr/l

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-22 Thread Simon Josefsson
Philip Hands writes: > Mathias Gibbens writes: > >> On Sun, 2024-04-21 at 18:47 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > ... >>> /usr/libexec/minio-client/bin/mc -> /usr/bin/mcli > > Might I suggest that the link goes the other way, so that the symlink > lives in /usr/bin? That way the existence of the

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-22 Thread Philip Hands
Mathias Gibbens writes: > On Sun, 2024-04-21 at 18:47 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: ... >> /usr/libexec/minio-client/bin/mc -> /usr/bin/mcli Might I suggest that the link goes the other way, so that the symlink lives in /usr/bin? That way the existence of the lib directory is somewhat self-docu

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-21 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Sun, 2024-04-21 at 18:47 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Marco d'Itri writes: > > > On Apr 21, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > > > >   While that might work for them, it obviously doesn't at a higher > > > packaging level. Per Policy Section 10.1, I'm bringing this to d-devel > > > for any commen

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-21 Thread Simon Josefsson
Marco d'Itri writes: > On Apr 21, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > >> While that might work for them, it obviously doesn't at a higher >> packaging level. Per Policy Section 10.1, I'm bringing this to d-devel >> for any comments or suggestions on my plan for packaging the MinIO >> Client. Following wh

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2024-04-21 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 21, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > While that might work for them, it obviously doesn't at a higher > packaging level. Per Policy Section 10.1, I'm bringing this to d-devel > for any comments or suggestions on my plan for packaging the MinIO > Client. Following what several other distributions