Re: BTS and maintainer changes (and PTS)

2003-12-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Isaac Clerencia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031216 11:25]: > On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 06:19, Graham Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > > > I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated > > > control file uploaded; it has now been in the ar

Re: BTS and maintainer changes

2003-12-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > How quickly is a change of maintainer supposed to propagate to the BTS? > > I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated > control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several > days. I have checked

Re: BTS and maintainer changes (and PTS)

2003-12-16 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 06:19, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > > I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated > > control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several > > days. > > I am in the same situation wi

Re: BTS and maintainer changes

2003-12-15 Thread Graham Wilson
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated > control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several > days. I am in the same situation with hostname. > Nevertheless, the BTS persists in giving the Q