On Aug 28, 11:56pm, Bdale Garbee wrote:
} Subject: Re: BSD lpr vs. LPRng
} In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
} :
} : The only incompatibility is that you might have to add a :bk: entry to
} : the printcap in order to print to a BSD-lpd-based network printer.
}
} I care a lot
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
:
: The only incompatibility is that you might have to add a :bk: entry to
: the printcap in order to print to a BSD-lpd-based network printer.
I care a lot about compatibility with other BSD'ish lpd-based systems. I
could live with this easily.
Bdale
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Richard Kaszeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >I created an LPRng package for Debian. LPRng is an enhanced BSD-like
> >print spooler and is nearly compatible. (It is available at
> >ftp://iona.ie/pub/plp/LPRng/ ).
> >
> >I'm thinking of obsoleting the lpr package by
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven Rudolph writes:
> >
> > I created an LPRng package for Debian. LPRng is an enhanced BSD-like
> > print spooler and is nearly compatible. (It is available at
> > ftp://iona.ie/pub/plp/LPRng/ ).
>
> Is it's call compa
Sven Rudolph writes:
>
> I created an LPRng package for Debian. LPRng is an enhanced BSD-like
> print spooler and is nearly compatible. (It is available at
> ftp://iona.ie/pub/plp/LPRng/ ).
Is it's call compatible? Or does the user have to learn a new syntax?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
>I created an LPRng package for Debian. LPRng is an enhanced BSD-like
>print spooler and is nearly compatible. (It is available at
>ftp://iona.ie/pub/plp/LPRng/ ).
>
>I'm thinking of obsoleting the lpr package by LPRng.
>Cons:
>- minor incompatibility (needs addditional flag in printcap for
> pri
6 matches
Mail list logo
