Daniele Tricoli writes:
> On Tuesday 25 August 2015 13:08:12 Ole Streicher wrote:
>> This is probably the way to go. However, the original package does not
>> update the data on a regular base. It checks whether the data are
>> current when they are accessed and downloads a new version if the loca
On Tuesday 25 August 2015 13:08:12 Ole Streicher wrote:
> This is probably the way to go. However, the original package does not
> update the data on a regular base. It checks whether the data are
> current when they are accessed and downloads a new version if the local
> version is too old.
What
Danny Edel writes:
> From a system administrator's point of view, the following would be all
> right to me:
>
> * When you install the package, debconf asks if you want the automated
> upgrades, preferably telling me how often its going to download them and
> information about the source. (And I k
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Aug 25, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> What is the best way to keep these data up to date in Debian? An
>> automated process as written in the pull request [1] is probably not the
>> right way, since it is a potential privacy violation. One could let the
> I am f
On 25/08/2015 08:44, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the best way to keep these data up to date in Debian? An
> automated process as written in the pull request [1] is probably not the
> right way, since it is a potential privacy violation. One could let the
> user manually start the d
On 25/08/15 09:44, Ole Streicher wrote:
> What is the best way to keep these data up to date in Debian? An
> automated process as written in the pull request [1] is probably not the
> right way, since it is a potential privacy violation.
Hi Ole,
I wouldnt say that it' automatically bad to downloa
On Aug 25, Ole Streicher wrote:
> What is the best way to keep these data up to date in Debian? An
> automated process as written in the pull request [1] is probably not the
> right way, since it is a potential privacy violation. One could let the
I am frankly tired of people screaming "privacy v
7 matches
Mail list logo
