On 11 Jan 1998, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> ftp://ftp.ci.tuwien.ac.at/pub/export/flpr
Thank you, Ardo!
The URL changed sligtly to:
ftp://ftp.ci.tuwien.ac.at/pub/flpr
Hubert
--
Hubert Weikert DB1MQ Mem
Some time ago I stumbled upon a package which provides a solution
for this problem. It's called flpr and is a "magic filter" running
in the user space so it can e.g. get to the .ps files. Further, it
has some nice features as being able to print a .ps file in 2 or even
4 pages per physical side.
The .ps Files are included by dvips during his run as part of the
lpd magicfilter. This process runs in a other directory (the spool
directory). Xdvi runs in your working directory. The use of
magicfilter makes no sense if you want to reference other files from
your print file (like .ps files from
Your right about AucTeX, heck I've used it many times now. We did just
switch LaTeX distributions though didn't we?
> > Btw, if you have ever managed
> > to make dvi files with ps images print right through magicfilter, I would
> > love to hear how you did it.
>
> Is there really a ps2dvi progr
On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 03:26:48AM -0900, Britton wrote:
>
> On 7 Jan 1998, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
>
> > AucTeX is listed as orphaned in wnpp; I'm willing to take over its
> > maintenance if nobody objects.
>
> I think this might be because teTeX has now replaced AucTeX as the Debian
> TeX
> "APH" == Adam P Harris.
I've uploaded auctex_9.8i-1 to master: maybe someone could look at it to
see if I've done things the right way.
I put a note in Description telling XEmacs people they don't need to
install it and compiled things with GNU/Emacs.
>> 3) Current AucTeX package puts its
> I think this might be because teTeX has now replaced AucTeX as the Debian
> TeX/LaTeX distribution of choice. Of course TeX/LaTeX is so darn
> complicated I'm not really sure about this.
AucTeX is not a TeX distribution but a set of Emacs macros for easier
editing of (La)TeX documents.
Anselm
On 7 Jan 1998, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> AucTeX is listed as orphaned in wnpp; I'm willing to take over its
> maintenance if nobody objects.
I think this might be because teTeX has now replaced AucTeX as the Debian
TeX/LaTeX distribution of choice. Of course TeX/LaTeX is so darn
complicate
[Removed CC to ]
[You ("Davide G. M. Salvetti")]
>1) AucTeX has many .el's which should be shipped byte-compiled: should I
>compile them with some specific Emacs flavor or doesn't it matter which
>Emacs I'll use? (Please consider that, AFAIK, XEmacs comes with its own
>AucTeX, so AucTeX should p
9 matches
Mail list logo
