Hi,
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> That is a good point. Thanks Thomas. We could submit apport reports with
> the tag "Apport" and instruct reportbug to forward the report to
> "pack...@qa.debian.org".
>
> This way we avoid the flood of bug reports in general while at the same
>
On Monday 13 May 2013 11:26 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 03:06 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> > 1) Duplicate bug reports: There are high possibilities that we could see
>> > a sudden increase in the number of bug reports, many duplicates. This is
>> > something I'm not sure how we wan
Le mardi 14 mai 2013 à 00:40 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > - adjust the buildds to begin generating debug symbols packages
> >automatically - perhaps reusing pkgbinarymangler from Ubuntu, or perhaps
> >using it as a reference
>
> Patches to debhelper already exist, to generate on
Le lundi 13 mai 2013 à 12:34 -0500, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> - implement the changes necessary to ensure all binary packages in the
>archive are built on the buildds, not on developers' systems[1]
This is not even necessary.
> - deploy centralized infrastructure, outside of the main arch
On Monday 13 May 2013 11:04 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> From past discussions, I think there's a very clear consensus in favor of
> doing this; it's now a SMOP.
>
> The requirements are, in order:
>
> - implement the changes necessary to ensure all binary packages in the
>archive are built on
On 05/13/2013 03:06 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> 1) Duplicate bug reports: There are high possibilities that we could see
> a sudden increase in the number of bug reports, many duplicates. This is
> something I'm not sure how we want to evaluate. We could give apport a
> try, and leave it to the
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:56:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Steve Langasek [2013-05-13 11:22 -0500]:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 06:21:24PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > On Monday 13 May 2013 03:55 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> > > > note that, unlike Ubuntu we do not provide automated debug pac
+++ Steve Langasek [2013-05-13 11:22 -0500]:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 06:21:24PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Monday 13 May 2013 03:55 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> > > note that, unlike Ubuntu we do not provide automated debug packages.
> > > Hence many crash reports aren't usable at all when
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 06:21:24PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 13 May 2013 03:55 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> > note that, unlike Ubuntu we do not provide automated debug packages.
> > Hence many crash reports aren't usable at all when they are generated on
> > Debian systems.
> This cou
On Monday 13 May 2013 03:22 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Another issue is privacy; backtraces may contain private information
> that should not leave the system and there is no automated way to
> determine that. How does Ubuntu deal with that?
Unfortunately, there's no intelligence in apport client to d
On Monday 13 May 2013 03:55 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> note that, unlike Ubuntu we do not provide automated debug packages.
> Hence many crash reports aren't usable at all when they are generated on
> Debian systems.
This could be a start. It could help users request debug packages from
package mainta
Hi,
On 13.05.2013 09:06, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Apport [1] is an automated crash reporting tool. It could also be used
> as a bug reporting tool, but there are certain features missing (a text
> input to add user description), not making it a candidate for reporting
> bugs. For crashes, apport
Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
> ]] Paul Wise
>
> > Another issue is privacy; backtraces may contain private information
> > that should not leave the system and there is no automated way to
> > determine that. How does Ubuntu deal with that?
>
> IIRC, they mark
]] Paul Wise
> Another issue is privacy; backtraces may contain private information
> that should not leave the system and there is no automated way to
> determine that. How does Ubuntu deal with that?
IIRC, they mark the bugs as private on submission, then they have a
server-side process that p
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Apport for Debian currently resides in experimental with a whopping
> popcon stat of 11000+ installs. In the past, I have blogged [2] about
> apport's state in Debian, where I received some constructive feedback.
The popcon stats are pro
15 matches
Mail list logo
