Le 25/06/2014 08:49, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> This happened a few times already but only with well know DD.
For what it's worth, Ole is well known an respected in the area in which
he has contributed most, the Debian Astro team, which he created.
Kind regards, Thibaut.
signature.asc
Descri
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> FTR I used to be an Alioth admin, so I have some experience with the
> work involved.
>
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > Sorry to be blunt Raphael, but your response looks like a series of
> > platitudes designed to settle down the pol
FTR I used to be an Alioth admin, so I have some experience with the
work involved.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Russell Stuart wrote:
> Sorry to be blunt Raphael, but your response looks like a series of
> platitudes designed to settle down the politics. Alioth's maintenance
> is in serious trouble. It
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> > I thought that usually such requests should be done through an request
> > for help? (Is that valid for "pseudo packages" like a hypothetical
> > alioth one?) If the alioth admin team would openly request for help
> > (maybe on t
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 18:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> > I thought that usually such requests should be done through an request
> > for help? (Is that valid for "pseudo packages" like a hypothetical
> > alioth one?) If the alioth admin team would ope
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> I thought that usually such requests should be done through an request
> for help? (Is that valid for "pseudo packages" like a hypothetical
> alioth one?) If the alioth admin team would openly request for help
> (maybe on the Debian-News?), they may gain
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> I can imagine that behind any of the tickets on alioth there is a story
>> like this, so I don't want to bring my one onto the front.
>> So, how do we get rid of the ~200 open support requests?
>
> Join the team handling alioth
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I can imagine that behind any of the tickets on alioth there is a story
> like this, so I don't want to bring my one onto the front.
>
> So, how do we get rid of the ~200 open support requests?
Join the team handling alioth and start working on those is
Hi Tollef and all,
> I'm not disagreeing, I think we're providing a much poorer service level
> for Alioth than what we should do. Sadly, I don't have the motivation
> to spend much time there nowadays.
So what should we do here? Since you are listed as the first person on
the "site admin" page
On May 12, 2014, at 05:46 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>Mailman 3 is completely different from Mailman 3 and I see no synergy in
>basing anything on the existing package. As of now, to my knowledge no
>migration or upgrade scenarios exist from MM 2 to MM 3, and I'm not sure
>if such code will be the
On Mon, May 12, 2014 17:00, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:02:35AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> I don't have time to work on Alioth, but JFTR, we (the GNU Mailman
>> development team) recently announced the first full-suite beta release
>> for Mailman 3. It's possible that even wi
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:02:35AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I don't have time to work on Alioth, but JFTR, we (the GNU Mailman development
> team) recently announced the first full-suite beta release for Mailman 3.
> It's possible that even with the usual beta-quality issues, that MM3 would
> m
On May 12, 2014, at 07:57 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>For mailing lists, I read in the thread that it may not be a problem anyway,
>but I just wanted to add one thing: in many cases the lists to be created are
>a maintainer list and a commit list, and this could be replaced completely by
>the “new
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Russell Stuart wrote:
> sourceforge is closed source.
That is no longer the case, sourceforge folks implemented a new
codebase called Allura, are running it, released it under the Apache
license and continue to develop it as an Apache Software Foundation
project.
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 21:38 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I'm not disagreeing, I think we're providing a much poorer service level
> for Alioth than what we should do. Sadly, I don't have the motivation
> to spend much time there nowadays.
I have for years hosted my own projects in a minimalist
Le Sun, May 11, 2014 at 03:58:50PM +0200, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>
> Other people have had problems with alioth too:
>
> - write permissions on VCS directory for new projects
>
> - mailing list creation requests waiting for admin approval
Thanks Daniel for raising the issue.
For mailing lists
]] Daniel Pocock
> On 11/05/14 18:26, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Daniel Pocock
> >
> >> On 08/05/14 12:27, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> >>
> >>> What is the reason that the processing there is so slow? Is there a way
> >>> to change that?
> >
> > I think it's quite clear and has been for a while
On 11/05/14 18:26, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Daniel Pocock
>
>> On 08/05/14 12:27, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
>>
>>> What is the reason that the processing there is so slow? Is there a way
>>> to change that?
>
> I think it's quite clear and has been for a while that we need more
> active admins f
]] Daniel Pocock
> On 08/05/14 12:27, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
>
> > What is the reason that the processing there is so slow? Is there a way
> > to change that?
I think it's quite clear and has been for a while that we need more
active admins for Alioth.
> Other people have had problems with alioth
Quoting Daniel Pocock (2014-05-11 15:58:50)
> On 08/05/14 12:27, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
>> is someone processing the items on the Alioth tracker?
Thanks for raising that general question here, Ole. I have been
wondering too.
> Other people have had problems with alioth too:
[details snipped]
P
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 11.05.2014, 15:58 +0200 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>
> On 08/05/14 12:27, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is someone processing the items on the Alioth tracker?
[...]
>
> Other people have had problems with alioth too:
>
> - write permissions on VCS directory for new proje
On 08/05/14 12:27, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is someone processing the items on the Alioth tracker?
>
> There are currently 184 reuqests open, some trivial requests already
> since two years (like [1]).
>
> I filed a ticket there a month ago, and still did not get any
> response yet.
>
>
Hello,
On Sun, 09.07.2006 at 22:15:40 +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We (iso-codes maintenance team and, more precisely Tobias Toedter)
> discovered that some people reported bugs in the Alioth BTS (or
> tracker?) without us even knowing about it..:-)
I've seen a very si
Peter Samuelson, 2006-07-09 21:30:11 +0200 :
> [Toni Mueller]
>> I've just poked around a bit in Alioth for a project I'm working on
>> and found a bug report with a bug number that has no resemblance to
>> anything in BTS, quite contrary to my initial assumption.
>
> Yeah, the sourceforge softwar
On 7/10/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 09 July 2006 21:29, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > I've just poked around a bit in Alioth for a project I'm working on
> > and found a bug report with a bug number that has no resemblance to
> > anything in BTS, quite contrary to my initial a
Quoting Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Yeah, I couldn't tell you why that feature is even enabled on alioth.
> Do people actually use it? I certainly never check the tracker for
> alioth projects I'm involved with; I just assume people will use the
> Debian BTS instead.
We (iso-codes mai
On Sunday 09 July 2006 21:29, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > I've just poked around a bit in Alioth for a project I'm working on
> > and found a bug report with a bug number that has no resemblance to
> > anything in BTS, quite contrary to my initial assumption.
>
> Yeah, the sourceforge software inclu
[Toni Mueller]
> I've just poked around a bit in Alioth for a project I'm working on
> and found a bug report with a bug number that has no resemblance to
> anything in BTS, quite contrary to my initial assumption.
Yeah, the sourceforge software includes a primitive bug tracker which,
as far as I
also sprach Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.09.2017 +0200]:
> I've just poked around a bit in Alioth for a project I'm working
> on and found a bug report with a bug number that has no
> resemblance to anything in BTS, quite contrary to my initial
> assumption. Imho this would only make s
29 matches
Mail list logo
