On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:04:53AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory
> > since long time ago, IIRC before hamm.
>
> No, it's not in policy yet.
Sorry, I meant to say "yes you can". But it should become policy soon,
so tha
Previously Josip Rodin wrote:
> Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory
> since long time ago, IIRC before hamm.
No, it's not in policy yet.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes fo
> On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 09:24:48PM -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> > >> Can I upload packages with the /usr/info -> /usr/share/info modification?
> > >
> > >Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory
> > >since long time ago, IIRC before hamm.
> >
> > Okay, the
would be nice to have the compatibility stuff in one seperate package.
e.g. one package, that symlinks /usr/share/doc to /usr/doc,
/usr/share/man to /usr/man, /usr/share/info to /usr/info.
remember that we want to get rid of the old stuff at some point, and this
should be as smoth as possible. doi
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 07:48:54AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > > Can I upload packages with the /usr/info -> /usr/share/info modification?
> >
> > Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory
> > since long time ago, IIRC before hamm.
> >
> > > Can I upload packag
On Mon, 24 May, 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 12:53:51PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > Can I upload packages with the /usr/info -> /usr/share/info modification?
>
> Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory
> since long time ago, IIRC before h
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 09:24:48PM -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> >> Can I upload packages with the /usr/info -> /usr/share/info modification?
> >
> >Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory
> >since long time ago, IIRC before hamm.
>
> Okay, then I propose th
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 12:53:51PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
>> Can I upload packages with the /usr/info -> /usr/share/info modification?
>
>Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory
>since long time ago, IIRC before hamm.
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 12:53:51PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> Can I upload packages with the /usr/info -> /usr/share/info modification?
Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory
since long time ago, IIRC before hamm.
> Can I upload packages with the /usr/man ->
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Christian Leutloff wrote:
> > So it would be very good to hear from people: what problems are we
> > likely to face in the move, how can we do it without destroying 2500+
> > packages, etc., etc.
>
> Why not integrating tests for the FHS compliance into li
On Mon, 24 May, 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> As nobody has yet argued against my policy proposal of adopting the
> FHS, it is likely to become policy quite soon. So we need to start
> actively thinking about how to go about managing the changeover, and
> which exceptions we will make.
>
> A quick
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So it would be very good to hear from people: what problems are we
> likely to face in the move, how can we do it without destroying 2500+
> packages, etc., etc.
Why not integrating tests for the FHS compliance into lintian!? First
they are warnings and
Le 1999-05-24, Julian Gilbey écrivait :
> AFAIK, the /usr/info -> /usr/share/info is well under way, as is
> /usr/lib/texmf -> /usr/share/texmf.
sgml-tools has a longstanding bug on this problem (#35965),
opened on Apr. 12th.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web.fdn.fr/~tquinot/>
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 02:09:05AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> We may need some mass NMU's, but it would be nice if that could be
> avoided.
We shouldn't need those. The only thing I expect that would take mass
NMUs is the /usr/doc and /usr/man things. Both should be possible to
happen over ti
18 matches
Mail list logo
