Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One of my initial packages was non-free (still is, although I hold out
> hope for a licence change at some point). I suggest that a better policy
> is closer to this:
>
> New maintainers applying as packagers should contribute something to
> main as
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:06:50AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> > People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> > non-free package are showing that t
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to Free Softwa
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 11:58:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > I'm just telling that asking for a sponsor for non-free
> > packages is not helping the project.
>
> If the package is useful it is helping the users.
>
> > I wo
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> I'm just telling that asking for a sponsor for non-free
> packages is not helping the project.
If the package is useful it is helping the users.
> I wonder if such people really know that Debian is not only about
> technique
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:41:31AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> it's unreasonable to have a nontechnical barrier to entry which doesn't
> apply to existing members.
Agreed.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
> > I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
[...]
> > People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> > non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> > our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
>
Debian *does* support non-free softwar
Hi Jérôme,
Le Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, Jérôme Marant écrivait:
> Hi,
>
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
Sponsors are free to decide who they sponsor and what they sponsor.
There's no need for any new rule ...
May i let you know that when I package
"Vince Mulhollon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I disagree with Jérôme Marant, with evidence supporting that disagreement
> below:
This is strange that you did not even comment the first part
of my message.
--
Jérôme Marant
On 01/14/2002 10:05:52 AM af_mara wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > It's clear that free software is better than non-free software but
please
>> > don't forget that you agreed that "We will support our users who
develop
>> > and run non-free software on Debian".
>>
>> I'd l
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Jérôme,
>
> > I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> > People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> > non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> > our philosophy and dedication to Free Soft
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to Free Softwa
On 14 Jan 2002, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jérôme,
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
d
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to
14 matches
Mail list logo
