Hello,
Neil answered me off-list. I'm putting this info on-list just FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 27/11/2007 20:01
Subject: Re: Fwd: About dpkg-shlibdeps checks
To: Hector Oron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hecto
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Until dpkg-shlibdeps has been modified to support natively cross-build,
> > you'll have to indicate him where to find libraries for other
> > architectures with LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/arm-linux-gnu/lib/ or similar.
>
> Thanks, it look like it somehow
Hello,
> Until dpkg-shlibdeps has been modified to support natively cross-build,
> you'll have to indicate him where to find libraries for other
> architectures with LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/arm-linux-gnu/lib/ or similar.
Thanks, it look like it somehow worked, but then i'm missing another library...
On 2007-11-26, Hector Oron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried with option: -uignore-missing-info
> ARCH=arm MAKEFLAGS="CC=something" dh_shlibdeps -plibgcc1-arm-cross
> -uignore-missing-info
I couldn't get -u to work when I_tried on native packages.
The long options did work though.
--dpkg-shl
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Hector Oron wrote:
> I tried with option: -uignore-missing-info
>
> ARCH=arm MAKEFLAGS="CC=something" dh_shlibdeps -plibgcc1-arm-cross
> -uignore-missing-info
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libc.so.6 (note: only
> packages with 'shlibs' files are looked into)
I tried with option: -uignore-missing-info
ARCH=arm MAKEFLAGS="CC=something" dh_shlibdeps -plibgcc1-arm-cross
-uignore-missing-info
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libc.so.6 (note: only
packages with 'shlibs' files are looked into).
dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 512
make
Hello,
When trying to build a cross compiler i get an error:
dh_makeshlibs -plibgcc1-arm-cross -V 'libgcc1-arm-cross (>= 1:4.2.1)' -n
sed s/-arm-cross//g < debian/libgcc1-arm-cross/DEBIAN/shlibs >
debian/libgcc1-arm-cross/DEBIAN/shlibs.fixed
mv debian/libgcc1-arm-cross/DEBIAN/shlibs.fixed
debia
On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 10:07 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > But what is the intended way of fixing things with the newer
> > dpkg-shlibdeps ? Adding --rpath ?
>
> Helping dpkg-shlibdeps with LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the right thing as you did
> below...
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> After my last attempts to rebuild the archive (using rebuildd) on
> powerpc, I've faced that given this, lots of packages now FTBFS.
I know, and I expect most of them to not happen any more with dpkg
1.14.11.
In any case, I've asked Lucas to do a f
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 07:26:41PM +, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 10:39 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > as announced in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/09/msg4.html the
> > new dpkg-shlibdeps is stricter in what it accepts and w
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 10:39 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as announced in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/09/msg4.html the
> new dpkg-shlibdeps is stricter in what it accepts and will fail when it
> can't find dependency information for a library that is used
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> But what is the intended way of fixing things with the newer
> dpkg-shlibdeps ? Adding --rpath ?
Helping dpkg-shlibdeps with LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the right thing as you did
below... (option -l for dh_shlibdeps)
> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/octave-2.9
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 10:39 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
> as announced in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/09/msg4.html the
> new dpkg-shlibdeps is stricter in what it accepts and will fail when it
> can't find dependency information for a library that is
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Luk Claes wrote:
> Nowadays there are better alternatives to uploading to unstable for
> archive wide testing IMHO. Uploading to experimental is a good thing to
> have some initial testing on many architectures, though I would go for a
> rebuild of the whole archive for testing
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:49:10PM +, Luk Claes wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >> On 2007-11-23, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Well, the d-d-a mail included a list of affected packages. So we had a
> >>> clue on how many package
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2007-11-23, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Well, the d-d-a mail included a list of affected packages. So we had a
>>> clue on how many packages are affected. The list has probably evolved
>>> since september but
[ CCing #452511 as I provide an explanation of why we shouldn't change
back to --ignore-missing-info by default without careful consideration ]
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Damn I wanted to answer to that, and forgot: I don't think anyone
> wants a revert. I'd expect you to make
On ven, nov 23, 2007 at 11:31:57 +, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> But I'm just not willing to fully revert a decision
Damn I wanted to answer to that, and forgot: I don't think anyone
wants a revert. I'd expect you to make lower the dpkg-shlibdeps
expectations for a while, so that we can take ou
On 2007-11-23, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> they have some fixing to do (in particular when it looks like they don't
> really understand the issues at hand).
If this was targetted at me, then please explain me what I don't really
understand.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On ven, nov 23, 2007 at 11:31:57 +, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> (in particular when it looks like they don't really understand the
> issues at hand).
Please, this ad hominem isn't deserved, because the KDE team could
exactly answer the same to you. Mind you, but the huge workload you just
infli
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:15:46AM +, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> > But forcing every maintainer that probably had an agenda for their
> > package already, to comply to yours without even knowing what's coming
> > is at the very least tactless and disruptive.
>
> the n
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2007-11-23, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the d-d-a mail included a list of affected packages. So we had a
> > clue on how many packages are affected. The list has probably evolved
> > since september but not by much.
>
> Except
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> But forcing every maintainer that probably had an agenda for their
> package already, to comply to yours without even knowing what's coming
> is at the very least tactless and disruptive.
the new dpkg was in experimental for a long enough time, and this was
announced of
On ven, nov 23, 2007 at 10:14:51 +, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > does your plan include having a version of the dpkg-shlibdeps that
> > works in "warning-mode" only so that we can have a more extensive idea
> > of how the things are going to be, bef
On 2007-11-23, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the d-d-a mail included a list of affected packages. So we had a
> clue on how many packages are affected. The list has probably evolved
> since september but not by much.
Except covering kde now. KDE didn't change that much since s
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> does your plan include having a version of the dpkg-shlibdeps that
> works in "warning-mode" only so that we can have a more extensive idea
> of how the things are going to be, before it stops the development of
> the biggest and already hardest packa
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:39:58AM +, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as announced in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/09/msg4.html the
> new dpkg-shlibdeps is stricter in what it accepts and will fail when it
> can't find dependency information for a library that i
27 matches
Mail list logo
